Closes [1744](https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1744).
This PR migrates attachments to morph relations behind a feature flag,
following the TimelineActivity pattern. it introduces the
`IS_ATTACHMENT_MIGRATED` flag, updates standard field metadata and
indexes to use morph relations, adds a workspace migration that renames
`attachment.*Id` columns to `target*Id` and converts the corresponding
field metadata to `MORPH_RELATION` with a shared `morphId`. On the
frontend, attachment read/write paths now switch to `target*Id` when the
flag is enabled.
It also fixes optimistic filtering for morph join columns. The metadata
API deduplicates morph fields, so attachments now expose a single target
field of type `MORPH_RELATION` plus a `morphRelations` array listing
each target object. Because only one `settings.joinColumnName` is
returned (e.g. `targetRocketId`), filters like `targetCompanyId` don’t
map to any field and the optimistic cache code throws.
`doesMorphRelationJoinColumnMatch` resolves this by computing all valid
join column names from `morphRelations` using
`computeMorphRelationFieldName` and comparing them to the filter key.
That makes filters like `targetCompanyId` resolvable even with a single
target field, so attachment uploads and list matching no longer crash.
<img width="477" height="474" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/50e19418-3438-4d1e-9f1f-1bc1a03174a9"
/>
<br />
<br />
Today the metadata API returns one morph field called `target` and a
list of possible targets (`morphRelations`), but it does not tell us the
join column for each target. That’s why the Frontend had to compute join
column names.
If we want to fix this at the API level, there are two options:
- Add join column names to each target in `morphRelations` (e.g. company
→ `targetCompanyId`). This is additive and low‑risk.
- Return each target as its own field (`targetCompany`, `targetPerson`,
etc.) instead of a single target. This is a larger change because it
changes the shape of metadata and would require more UI updates.
<!-- CURSOR_SUMMARY -->
---
> [!NOTE]
> Introduces morph relations for attachments behind
`IS_ATTACHMENT_MIGRATED`, aligning server schema/metadata and frontend
behavior.
>
> - Adds `IS_ATTACHMENT_MIGRATED` flag (frontend/server) and
seeds/defaults; updates generated GraphQL enums
> - New workspace upgrade `1.17` command migrates data: renames
`attachment.*Id` → `target*Id` and converts related fields to
`MORPH_RELATION` with shared `morphId`
> - Updates standard field metadata and indexes to `target*` (attachment
+ related objects), dev seeds, snapshots, and workspace entity types
> - Frontend: switches attachment read/write filters via
`getActivityTargetObjectFieldIdName` using the feature flag; updates
hooks/components (`useAttachments`, `useUploadAttachmentFile`, editors);
expands `Attachment` type
> - Fixes optimistic cache filtering to recognize morph join columns in
`isRecordMatchingFilter` by computing valid join-column keys from
`morphRelations`
>
> <sup>Written by [Cursor
Bugbot](https://cursor.com/dashboard?tab=bugbot) for commit
f208fa23b1135af114f484f6d65041a816d6e718. This will update automatically
on new commits. Configure
[here](https://cursor.com/dashboard?tab=bugbot).</sup>
<!-- /CURSOR_SUMMARY -->
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix@twenty.com>
Previously we introduced useUpdateOneRecordV2 to handle morph relations.
In this PR we are removing it to only use useUpdateOneRecord which has
been adapted not to requires objectMetadataNameSingular in its props.
## Summary
Moves the custom ESLint rules from `tools/eslint-rules` to
`packages/twenty-eslint-rules` for better organization within the
monorepo packages structure.
## Changes
- Move `eslint-rules` from `tools/` to `packages/twenty-eslint-rules`
- Use `loadWorkspaceRules` from `@nx/eslint-plugin` to load custom rules
- Update all ESLint configs to use the `twenty/` rule prefix instead of
`@nx/workspace-`
- Update `project.json`, `jest.config.mjs` with new paths
- Update `package.json` workspaces and `nx.json` cache inputs
- Update Dockerfile reference
## Technical Details
The custom ESLint rules are now loaded using Nx's `loadWorkspaceRules`
utility which:
- Handles TypeScript transpilation automatically
- Allows loading workspace rules from any directory
- Provides a cleaner approach than the previous `@nx/workspace-`
convention
## Testing
- Verified all 17 custom ESLint rules load correctly from the new
location
- Verified linting works on dependent packages (twenty-front,
twenty-server, etc.)
## Summary
- Enable editing for custom calendar event fields while keeping standard
fields read-only
- Load calendar event fields dynamically so custom field values are
editable everywhere they appear
- Preserve calendar event participants rendering
## Testing
- npx nx run twenty-front:lint:diff-with-main --skip-nx-cache
--output-style=stream
- npx jest --config packages/twenty-front/jest.config.mjs
--runTestsByPath
packages/twenty-front/src/modules/activities/calendar/hooks/__tests__/useCalendarEvents.test.tsx
## Notes
- Full nx lint/test are very slow locally after barrel generation; CI
should run the full suite
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
**Description**
Fixes the "Add new" button appearing in relation picker dropdowns for
workspace member relations (e.g., Account Owner on companies). Workspace
members cannot be created from relation pickers, so this button should
not appear.
**Changes Made**
- Modified RelationManyToOneFieldInput.tsx to conditionally pass the
onCreate prop to SingleRecordPicker only when
createNewRecordAndOpenRightDrawer is defined.
- Moved the conditional check to the JSX level for clarity.
**Technical Details**
The useAddNewRecordAndOpenRightDrawer hook already returns undefined for
workspace member relations, but the component was still passing a
handler function to SingleRecordPicker, causing the "Add new" button to
appear. The fix ensures that when createNewRecordAndOpenRightDrawer is
undefined, onCreate is also undefined, which prevents
SingleRecordPickerMenuItemsWithSearch from rendering the button.
Testing
- Verified that the "Add new" button no longer appears in the Account
Owner dropdown for companies.
- Confirmed that the "Add new" button still appears for other relation
fields where it's appropriate (e.g., People, Opportunities).
- Tested that existing functionality for selecting workspace members
from the dropdown still works correctly.
Fixes#17060
Upgraded from 8.6.15 to 9.1.17 in two steps:
- 8.6.15 -> 9.0.0
- 9.0.0 -> 9.1.17
I had to disable `storybook-addon-cookie` since it is not supported for
Storybook 9. However, I do intend to upgrade to Storybook 10 when this
is merged, so we can replace the aforementioned add-on with this fork
specifically created to support Storybook 10 and above:
https://www.npmjs.com/package/@storybook-community/storybook-addon-cookie.
Additionally, once we upgrade to Version 10 successfully, I will start
looking into integrating the official Vitest add-on.
- moved a few gql types to twenty shared to re-use in server
- added a new endpoint, onEventSubscription that expect a streamId to
create a connection
- two new endpoints to store queries in Redis
- updated the existing batch channel to directly use object record type
## Summary
Fixes#16900 - MS Office documents (doc, docx, ppt, pptx, xls, xlsx,
odt) cannot be previewed when hosted on local/private networks.
## Problem
Microsoft's Office Online viewer (`view.officeapps.live.com`) requires
documents to be publicly accessible from the internet. For self-hosted
Twenty instances or local development, files are not reachable by
Microsoft's servers, causing the viewer to fail with "An error
occurred".
## Solution
Detect private/local URLs upfront and show a helpful message with a
download button instead of letting the viewer fail silently.
**Detected private URLs:**
- `localhost`, `127.0.0.1`, `[::1]`
- Private IP ranges: `10.x.x.x`, `172.16-31.x.x`, `192.168.x.x`
- Local domain patterns: `.local`, `.localhost`, `.internal`
## Alternatives Explored (that don't work)
We investigated more sophisticated detection approaches:
1. **postMessage events** - Microsoft's viewer doesn't send any error
messages we can listen to
2. **Fetching the embed URL** - Blocked by CORS (Microsoft doesn't set
`Access-Control-Allow-Origin`)
3. **Reading iframe content** - Cross-origin restrictions prevent
JavaScript access
The URL-based detection is the most reliable approach for catching the
common cases where preview will definitely fail.
## Testing
1. Upload an Office file (docx, pptx, xlsx) on a local Twenty instance
2. Try to preview it
3. Should see "This file cannot be previewed because it is hosted
locally" with a Download button
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/16928 and
https://github.com/twentyhq/private-issues/issues/400
When an object is renamed, its corresponding relation field on
noteTarget and taskTarget are not renamed. This caused an issue as in
the FE, we used the related record object name to compute the field name
used in the payload.
This PR addresses it by, instead, finding the field name after
identifying it thanks to the object id.
To reproduce, you can rename an object then try to tie it to a note.
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/16809
# Introduction
Front was expected timeline activities field to be relation and not
morph relation
Also fixed the new v2 workspace creation that had a bug in the
createStandardRelation util ( it's not in production yet so everything's
fine )
## Summary
This PR enforces the use of `@/` alias for imports instead of relative
parent imports (`../`).
## Changes
### ESLint Configuration
- Added `no-restricted-imports` pattern in `eslint.config.react.mjs` to
block `../*` imports with the message "Relative parent imports are not
allowed. Use @/ alias instead."
- Removed the non-working `import/no-relative-parent-imports` rule
(doesn't work properly in ESLint flat config)
### VS Code Settings
- Added `javascript.preferences.importModuleSpecifier: non-relative` to
`.vscode/settings.json` (TypeScript setting was already there)
### Code Fixes
- Fixed **941 relative parent imports** across **706 files** in
`packages/twenty-front`
- All `../` imports converted to use `@/` alias
## Why
- Consistent import style across the codebase
- Easier to move files without breaking imports
- Better IDE support for auto-imports
- Clearer understanding of where imports come from
Solves #16015
- Added a check in `useTimelineActivities.ts` to see if the system
object page we're viewing has timelineActivity being tracked before
querying to get the activity history.
- Removed @WorkspaceIsObjectUIReadOnly decorator from system objects and
added @WorkspaceIsFieldUIReadOnly to standard and system fields to allow
custom field edits as requested in the issue.
- Did not add calendarEvents or other system objects to timelineActivity
just yet since keeping track of timeline activity for every one of them
felt counter-intuitive and bloated. In order to determine which objects
need timelineActivity, I think we need to fix the broken views of system
objects first, such as the one in the attached screenshots - a good
number of them are broken. The check I added to
`useTimelineActivities.ts` hook displays timeline activity as empty for
the time - error would not be shown as suggested by Thomas.
<img width="1062" height="858" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e877e0fe-b665-46e3-b785-e84f2af7f833"
/>
<br />
<img width="1061" height="858" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/0eba8c1c-444a-4b13-beda-64b95cf39077"
/>
- Editing custom fields on calendar events (and other objects without
position fields) crashed with TypeError: Cannot convert undefined or
null to object in sortCachedObjectEdges. This happened because some
cached queries had empty orderBy arrays ([]), and the optimistic effect
tried to sort with them. Objects without position fields returned
empty orderBy arrays when there were no sorts, while objects with
position fields automatically got [{ position: 'AscNullsFirst' }].
The backend always adds { id: 'AscNullsFirst' } as a fallback, but
the frontend didn't match this. So, I added { id: 'AscNullsFirst' } to
the Frontend as default orderBy when there are no sorts and no position
field.
<!-- CURSOR_SUMMARY -->
---
> [!NOTE]
> Apply per-field UI read-only to system/standard fields and skip
timeline activity fetching when the target object isn’t related; refine
record-table cell open/navigation behavior.
>
> - Server: Replace object-level UI read-only with per-field
`isUIReadOnly` across many standard objects (e.g., `calendarEvent`,
`workspaceMember`, messaging, calendar, favorites, attachments,
workflows, etc.), and mirror this via `@WorkspaceIsFieldUIReadOnly` on
workspace entities.
> - Frontend: In `useTimelineActivities.ts`, check object metadata for a
relation to `timelineActivity` and `skip` the query when absent,
preventing errors on system object pages.
> - Frontend: Simplify/adjust record-table cell logic—remove unused
args, allow navigation from first column when non-empty, block editing
for read-only records (while still allowing navigation), and update
button handlers/hover styles accordingly.
>
> <sup>Written by [Cursor
Bugbot](https://cursor.com/dashboard?tab=bugbot) for commit
dac1262d70d97ce84b39730454dd3579c494994a. This will update automatically
on new commits. Configure
[here](https://cursor.com/dashboard?tab=bugbot).</sup>
<!-- /CURSOR_SUMMARY -->
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix@twenty.com>
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/16624
Original issue:
- while persisting a field (calling useUpdateOne), the response from the
backend is missing the taskTargets many to many (same for note). As we
optimistically update the cache, we lose the "Relations" in the UI
- I'm changing the behavior of useUpsertInRecordStore to accept
recordGqlFields to only update the fields we want in the record store
(this way, we are not losing the targets information in our case)
# Introduction
In this pull-request we introduce a service dedicated to the
twenty-standard app installation, we will later be able to re-use
existing logic to be more generic and allow any app installation.
For the moment sticking to this usage
https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1995
## Encountered issues
- We decided not to migrate deprecated fields ( also they will become
custom field for any existing workspace having them in the future )
- duplicate criteria
- wrong search index declaration
- forgotten isSearchable
- Attachement seed
- Restored standardId
## Note
For the moment we're still searching through standardId for code that
run on both existing and new workspaces.
For code running on new workspace exclusively we're searching using
universalIdentifier
We will standardize universalIdentifier usage later when we've migratred
all the existing workspaces
## Workspace creation
Will handle workspace creation the same way in another PR
Related https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/15065
## TODO
- [ ] Double all frontend hardcoded queries to not refer to deprecated
fields especially attachments
## Summary
This PR adds the `lingui/no-unlocalized-strings` ESLint rule to detect
untranslated strings and fixes translation issues across multiple
components.
## Changes
### ESLint Configuration (`eslint.config.react.mjs`)
- Added comprehensive `ignore` patterns for non-translatable strings
(CSS values, HTML attributes, technical identifiers)
- Added `ignoreNames` for props that don't need translation (className,
data-*, aria-*, etc.)
- Added `ignoreFunctions` for console methods, URL APIs, and other
non-user-facing functions
- Disabled rule for debug files, storybook, and test files
### Components Fixed (~19 files)
- Object record components (field inputs, pickers, merge dialogs)
- Settings components (accounts, admin panel)
- Serverless function components
- Record table and title cell components
## Status
🚧 **Work in Progress** - ~124 files remaining to fix
This PR is being submitted as draft to allow progressive fixing of
remaining translation issues.
## Testing
- Run `npx eslint "src/**/*.tsx"` in `packages/twenty-front` to check
remaining issues
# TimelineActivity migration to morph
- Creates `timelineActivities2` relations on Company, Dashboard, Note,
Opportunity, Person, Task, Workflow, WorkflowRun, and WorkflowVersion
entities with proper metadata and cascade delete behavior.
It was required to create standard fields as well since the
mapObjectMetadataByUniqueIdentifier needs it. otherwise the fields won't
be considered
- Feature Flag `IS_TIMELINE_ACTIVITY_MIGRATED` necessary to have the two
states in parallel. It is used as a stamp once the migration has been
run
- Migration is done using the coreDataSource. Why ?
even though is unsafe to use, the first implementation of the migration
took forever on each workspace. See [this
commit](https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/15652/commits/477011e8d7d4c580f79ba7ec4a8fb002a3ec86b2)
The plan for this complex migration is as follows :

Note: we will need to rename fields in the release 1.12 (there is no
easy way to do all this in one release)
Timeline activities are fetched using the `useTimelineActivities` hook,
which relies on `useFindManyRecords`. Previously, it also fetched linked
object titles via `useLinkedObjectsTitle`.
When the user scrolled to the bottom, we triggered `fetchMore` from
`useFindManyRecords` to load additional data. This operation correctly
handled in-place loading and did not set the main `loading` flag to
`true`.
However, after `useFindManyRecords` returned updated data, new variables
were passed to `useLinkedObjectsTitle`, which didn’t leverage the
`fetchMore` pattern. As a result, the `loading` state of
`useLinkedObjectsTitle` was set to `true`, even when only partial data
changed.
Our logic for displaying the skeleton loader was:
```ts
const loading = loadingTimelineActivities || loadingLinkedObjectsTitle;
```
When `loadingLinkedObjectsTitle` turned `true`, this triggered the
entire list to unmount and remount, causing repeated unnecessary
reloads.
To resolve this, I no longer delay rendering the list while loading
linked objects title.
## Demo
The skeleton is only shown at the beginning of the navigation.
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/cb79f91d-5151-4dc1-8e6b-a322e56a48c4
Closes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/16210
This PR fixes an issue where links added inside a note were not
appearing in the preview shown under Company -> Notes. The link would
only appear after opening the note, which led to inconsistent behavior.
Issue:
Blocknote represents text and links using different node types:
1. { "type": "text", "text": "Welcome to this demo!" }
2. {
"type": "link",
"content": { "type": "text", "text": "Example" },
"href": "https://example.com"
}
The existing preview function only handled plain text nodes and
completely ignored link nodes.
As a result:
- Links did not appear in the preview
- Links appeared only inside the full note view
Steps to Reproduce:
- Add a link inside a note
- Go to Company / People and view the note preview -> the link is
missing
- Open the note -> the link appears correctly
How I fixed it:
- A new recursive text extraction function (extractText) was added to
correctly read.
- Text nodes
- Link nodes (including inner content and the href)
- Nested child content
- Link previews now appear in the following format:
DisplayText (https://example.com)
Edit : closes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/16043
---------
Co-authored-by: Etienne <45695613+etiennejouan@users.noreply.github.com>
CommandMenu did not push its own focus item to the focus stack when
focused. (See NavigationDrawerInput)
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
## Overview
This PR refactors the `CalendarEventDetails` component to dynamically
display both standard and custom fields added via the metadata API,
instead of using a hardcoded field list.
## Changes
- Replaced hardcoded `fieldsToDisplay` array with dynamic field fetching
using `useFieldListFieldMetadataItems` hook
- Split fields into `standardFields` (maintaining original order) and
`customFields`
- Introduced `renderField` helper function to eliminate code duplication
- Custom fields now automatically appear at the bottom of the detail
panel after standard fields
- Maintained exact field order and all existing functionality including
participant response status display
## Technical Details
- Uses existing `useFieldListFieldMetadataItems` pattern already
established in the codebase
- Standard field order explicitly defined: startsAt, endsAt,
conferenceLink, location, description
- Participant response status (Yes/Maybe/No) correctly positioned
between first 2 and last 3 standard fields
- All fields respect permissions and visibility settings from metadata
## Testing
- ✅ Verified all standard fields display in correct order
- ✅ Added custom field `mycustomfieldtest` via metadata API - displays
correctly at bottom
- ✅ Participant responses (Yes/Maybe/No) render correctly with avatars
- ✅ Event title, creation date, and event chip display properly
- ✅ Canceled event styling (strikethrough) works
- ✅ No console errors or regressions detected
- ✅ Read-only behavior maintained (calendar events sync from external
sources)
## Screenshots
<img width="1401" height="746" alt="CleanShot 2025-11-17 at 11 23 57"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/3d967ec5-6d31-4fc3-b971-c73ea521c87d"
/>
## Related
This enables users to extend calendar events with custom metadata fields
that will automatically display in the UI without code changes.
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
## Overview
This PR strengthens our permission system by introducing more granular
role-based access control across the platform.
## Changes
### New Permissions Added
- **Applications** - Control who can install and manage applications
- **Layouts** - Control who can customize page layouts and UI structure
- **AI** - Control access to AI features and agents
- **Upload File** - Separate permission for file uploads
- **Download File** - Separate permission for file downloads (frontend
visibility)
### Security Enhancements
- Implemented whitelist-based validation for workspace field updates
- Added explicit permission guards to core entity resolvers
- Enhanced ESLint rule to enforce permission checks on all mutations
- Created `CustomPermissionGuard` and `NoPermissionGuard` for better
code documentation
### Affected Components
- Core entity resolvers: webhooks, files, domains, applications,
layouts, postgres credentials
- Workspace update mutations now use whitelist validation
- Settings UI updated with new permission controls
### Developer Experience
- ESLint now catches missing permission guards during development
- Explicit guard markers make permission requirements clear in code
review
- Comprehensive test coverage for new permission logic
## Testing
- ✅ All TypeScript type checks pass
- ✅ ESLint validation passes
- ✅ New permission guards properly enforced
- ✅ Frontend UI displays new permissions correctly
## Migration Notes
Existing workspaces will need to assign the new permissions to roles as
needed. By default, all new permissions are set to `false` for non-admin
roles.
# Complete color refactoring
Closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1779
- Updated all colors to use Radix colors with P3 color space allowing
for brighter colors
- Created our own gray scale interpolated on Radix's scale to have the
same values for grays as the old ones in the app
- Introduced dark and light colors as well as there transparent versions
- Added many new colors from radix that can be used in the tags or in
the graphs
- Updated multiple color utilities to match new behaviors
- Changed the computation of Avatar colors to return only colors from
the theme (before it was random hsl)
These changes allow the user to use new colors in tags or charts, the
colors are brighter and with better contrast. We have a full range of
color variations from 1 to 12 where before we only had 4 adaptative
colors.
All these changes will allow us to develop custom themes for the user
soon, where users can choose their accent colors, background colors and
there contrast.
Fixes [Dependabot Alert
85](https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/security/dependabot/85) -
prototype pollution in lodash.
Added a shared pick helper (with unit tests) in twenty-shared and
refactored front-end/server code to import { pick } from the shared
barrel instead of lodash.pick.
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: martmull <martmull@hotmail.fr>
# Migrate Attachment Author to CreatedBy Field
**Twill Task**: https://twill.ai/twentyhq/ENG/tasks/7
## Summary
This PR implements a migration to transition the `Attachment` object
from using an `author` relation field to using the standard `createdBy`
field, addressing issue
https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1594.
## Changes
- **Added migration command**
(`1-8-migrate-attachment-author-to-created-by.command.ts`):
- Migrates existing attachment data to use `createdBy` instead of
`author`
- Ensures data integrity during the transition to the standard field
pattern
- **Updated Attachment workspace entity**:
- Added `createdBy` relation field to the `Attachment` standard object
- Registered new field ID in `standard-field-ids.ts` constants
- **Integrated migration into upgrade pipeline**:
- Added migration module for version 1.8
- Registered in the main upgrade version command module
This change aligns the `Attachment` object with Twenty's standard field
conventions by using the built-in `createdBy` field instead of a custom
`author` field.
---
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1594
---------
Co-authored-by: Twill <agent@twill.ai>
Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix@twenty.com>
This PR determines the minimal setup required to render dashboards
without errors while extracting them from the record show page. The
ultimate goal is to create a `PageLayoutRenderer` component that takes
any page layout configuration and correctly renders dashboards or record
pages.
Currently, the `DashboardCard` component renders itself the
`PageLayoutRenderer` component. The next step is to reverse the flow of
control and make `PageLayoutRenderer` take a configuration and decide
whether it should render a dashboard or something else.
This PR takes into consideration two comments left by Charles on [the
first PR scaffolding the
refactor](https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/15021): renaming
`targetRecord` to `targetRecordIdentifier` and adding tests to
`evaluateTabVisibility()`.
## Demo to assert this PR doesn't break everything
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/b5b99cf3-08fa-43d3-8da1-79018bc63641
Avoid fetching full steps and trigger for versions that are not the
current version. Because those won't be used anyway. Better for
performances.
Only difficulty was for the `createDraft` mutation. I needed to return
the full created version so I can store it in cache and use it as new
`currentVersion`. Otherwise the current version is considered as
incomplete for a short time, since workflow is fetched separately from
the current version.
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
This big PR implements table virtualization with an offset paging,
allowing a way more fluid UX.
It is a v1 that should be improved in the future with partial data
loading and optimization of the browser display performance of a row.
But with this PR we have the solid enough technical foundation, both
frontend and backend, to get to a smooth table UX.
Fixes and improvements after first successful round of development
(needed to have main clean) :
- [x] Delete should refresh virtualized portion only and reset all table
- [x] Fix add new : top and bottom
- [x] Table empty shouldn’t show when first loading
- [x] Fix d&d
- [x] Fix sorts
- [x] Fix drag when scrolling after a full virtual page (it throws an
error)
- [x] Si update mais qu’on a un sort ou filter, alors il faut trigger le
refresh
- [x] Reset scroll position between tables
- [x] Reset scroll shadows between tables
- [x] Setup d&n for virtual list :
https://github.com/hello-pangea/dnd/blob/main/docs/patterns/virtual-lists.md
- [x] Full table re-render when entering edit mode
- [x] Clean code and prepare for merge
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1613 that
contains other bugs to be fixed before merge
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
## Refactor: Prepare frontend record layouts for backend-driven
configuration
This PR simplifies and prepares the frontend record layout system for
eventual migration to backend-driven layouts, aligning the architecture
with the existing PageLayout system used for dashboards.
### Key Changes
**Architecture Improvements:**
- Created unified LayoutRenderingContext that works for both record
pages (with targetRecord) and dashboards (standalone)
- Replaced prop drilling with context-based data flow - cards access
targetRecord and isInRightDrawer via context hooks
- Introduced useTargetRecord() helper hook that provides type-safe
access to the current record
- Created generic CardRenderer component that handles configuration
injection and context guards uniformly
**Configuration System:**
- Converted all tab icons from React components to JSON-serializable
strings (e.g., Icon: IconCheckbox → icon: 'IconCheckbox')
- Added configuration field to cards, matching the widget configuration
pattern on the backend
- Created CardConfiguration types system similar to WidgetConfiguration
on the backend
- Moved widget-specific props (like showDuplicatesSection) into
configuration objects
**Code Organization:**
- Extracted visibility evaluation logic into reusable
evaluateTabVisibility() utility
- Organized layouts into dedicated files (one per object:
base-record-layout.ts, company-record-layout.ts, etc.)
- Renamed components to match their purpose: Notes → NotesCard,
Attachments → FilesCard, etc.
- Consolidated card rendering from registry object to direct
getCardComponent() function
**API Alignment:**
- Made ifNoReadPermissionObject an explicit part of TabVisibilityConfig
(follows if* naming convention)
- Removed redundant targetObjectNameSingular from tab-level (now derived
from visibility config)
- Card API now mirrors Widget API (both use type, configuration,
accessed via context)
## Problem
With Twenty usage growing, we are facing challenges on server side to
respond to the demand. The current bottleneck we are facing is server
CPU.
While investigating CPU performances, we figured out that loading all
relation fields was the biggest issue.
### About graphql query response size
**Example:** on `People Index` Table page:
we query: `person.company` and we query **all non relation fields** on
company relation field.
`{ person { company { id, name, domainName, employees, address ... } }`
However we only need **company.id, company.name and company.domainName**
to be able to render the Company Chip in the company column (RELATION)
in the table.
`{ person { company { id, name, domainName } }`
We initially assumed that the querying all non relation fields was not
an issue because it was not adding additional load on database (which is
also partially true: if a field is containing a huge json this will add
load on postgres as data needs to be transfered)
This assumption is wrong on CPU side:
- when loading one to many relations (company.people), this quickly ads
up and we end up with response of 20kB quite quickly, even without
adding any custom field on person.
- even when loading a many to one relation, if the user is storing big
data in a given field (note.body for instance, or workflowRun.state),
this starts also being an issue.
- Worst case scenario are starting to happen: on a production workspace
with 20 active workflows. Loading workflow table while displaying
workflow runs commands (20 workflows x 60 workflowRuns x
workflowRun.state which is a big JSON) result in a response of... 125MB.
### Why is it an issue?
When yoga (graphql engine) parses a response to send it back in server
response, it's using `JSON.parse `(or stringify depending on the case).
Parsing data is CPU instensive (as you need to validate, transform) and
this is more or less `O(n)`.
This means returning 125MB is very intense on the CPU and will likely
use 100% of the CPU for ~1sec in our production servers.
NodeJs (nodeV8) is single threaded. It's able to process multiple
requests in parallel but to do that, it will cut them in "microTasks"
and process each microTasks (that can belong to different requests) one
after the other. Exactly like a single threaded CPU would allocate some
time to a process and then to the next one, etc.
This means that this big response request will actually block the other
request.
As a result, all requests are slow and our infrastructure is multi
tenant so some customers are impacting others.
This is even a bigger issue when our health checks start to fail and
containers are starting being considered as unhealthy and killed by the
orchestrator
## How to fix this
1. On Front end side, we should only query what we need. In this PR, I'm
forcing the relations to only query: `id`, `labelIdentifier`,
`imageIdentifier`
2. (later) as we are API first, we also need to do something to protect
the servers from this side too. To do that, Graphql APIs can associate a
cost to each graphql field (maybe 1 for a test fixed, 2 for a JSON
field, 10 for relations, etc...) and we can throttle based on that.
## Changes in this PR
It's mainly about refactor the tooling to generate `RecordGqlFields`
(`generateDepthOneGqlFields`). this tooling is used to generate the list
of fields we want to query. Most of the time we want to query a record
with one level of nesting.
1) Refactor to remove duplicate code => `generateDepthOne` become
`generateDepth` and can handle both `depth = 0 | 1`
2) Introduce `generateDepthRecordGqlFieldsFromFields.ts` which is the
base and can give you a list of gqlFields based on FieldMetadataItems
3) Introduce `generateDepthRecordGqlFieldsFromObject` which is a
shortcut for an object
4) Introduce `generateDepthRecordGqlFieldsFromRecords` which is the
intersection between `generateDepthRecordGqlFieldsFromObject` and a
given record (useful for cache tooling)
5) Replace all usages + introduce a hook
`useGenerateDepthRecordGqlFieldsFromObject` to ease usage
## Scope
- Refactor SingleRecordPicker to handle morphItem and match Multiple one
- fix query generation to take morph into account
Left:
- double check SingleRecordPicker in Workflows / Form
- Fix tests / stories
Closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1560
If viewId is defined in a groupBy query, we want to apply all filters of
the view to the query.
This required to move a lot of code from twenty-front to twenty-shared
to convert the filters as stored in the db into graphql filters,
applying the right combinations between filters etc., which was
previously only done in the FE.
This PR does not handle any field filters, it will be done in a later pr
The goal of this PR is to test if Twenty can support a large number of
members, a question which was raised by a large company that is
considering moving away from Salesforce.
I was expecting the currentWorkspaceMembersState to cause a lot more
issue. It would be very hard to get rid of it in the context of actors,
I think that would require a big refactoring. I thought we'd have to do
it but it turns out the perf are pretty good. One thing we need to
improve is the pagination on the roles page, we'll wait for @Bonapara to
update that
This PR removes some unused props from FieldDefinition type and put some
recoil calls higher up in the hierarchy.
This PR fixes a regression on Chip introduced by
https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/11498, where we don't want
"Untitled" to be displayed in compact mode.
# FieldDefinition refactor
Removed `isLabelIdentifierCompact` and `labelIdentifierLink` which can
be derived directly in the chip component or computed in the record
table context.
Removed `disableTooltip` and `infoTooltipContent` because they were not
used.
Introduced `fieldMetadataItemId`, as optional for now, to have the
ability to progressively refactor the different things that could be
derived from this and `recordId`.
# Performance improvements
There's not a great deal to be gained for now on those modifications,
which specifically concern the identifier column.