Commit Graph

13 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Marie bc28e1557c Introduce updateWorkspaceMemberSettings and clarify product (#19441)
## Summary

Introduces a dedicated **metadata** mutation to update **standard
(non-custom)** workspace member settings, moves profile-related UI to
use it, and aligns **workspace member** record permissions with the rest
of the CRM so users cannot escalate visibility via RLS by editing their
own member record.

## Product behaviour

### Profile and appearance (standard fields)

- Users can still update **their own** standard workspace member fields
that the product exposes in **Settings / Profile** (e.g. name, locale,
color scheme, avatar flow) via the new
**`updateWorkspaceMemberSettings`** mutation.
- The mutation returns a **boolean**; the app **merges** the updated
fields into local state so the UI stays in sync without refetching the
full workspace member record.
- **Locale** changes also keep **`userWorkspace`** in sync when a locale
is present in the payload (including from the workspace `updateOne` path
when applicable).

### Custom fields on workspace members

- The dedicated metadata mutation **rejects** any **custom** workspace
member field (and unknown keys). Those updates must go through the
normal **object** `updateOne` pipeline, which is subject to **object-
and field-level** permissions like other records. But since we don't
have object- and field-level permission configuration for system objects
yet, this permission is derived from Workspace member settings
permission.
- **Workspace member** is no longer exempt from ORM permission
validation for updates merely because it is a **system** object. Users
who **do not** have workspace member access (e.g. no **Workspace
members** settings permission and no equivalent broad settings access on
the role) **cannot** use `updateOne` on `workspaceMember` to change
**custom** (or other) fields on their own row—even though that row is
used for RLS predicates.
- This closes a path where someone could widen what they can see by
writing to fields that drive row-level rules.

### Who can change another member

- Updating **another** user’s workspace member still requires
**Workspace members** (or equivalent) settings permission, consistent
with admin tooling.
2026-04-14 16:29:00 +00:00
Charles Bochet d5a7dec117 refactor: rename ObjectMetadataItem to EnrichedObjectMetadataItem and clean up metadata flows (#18830)
## Summary

- Renames `ObjectMetadataItem` to `EnrichedObjectMetadataItem` across
the entire frontend (~440 files) to clarify that this type includes
derived fields (`readableFields`, `updatableFields`, nested `fields[]`,
`indexMetadatas[]`) computed at read time from the metadata store
- Creates `splitObjectMetadataGqlResponse` that goes directly from a
GraphQL `ObjectMetadataItemsQuery` response to flat store items
(combining the old
`mapPaginatedObjectMetadataItemsToObjectMetadataItems` +
`splitObjectMetadataItemWithRelated` two-step flow into one call)
- Removes `ObjectMetadataItemWithRelated` type and all "WithRelated"
naming
- Renames `generatedMockObjectMetadataItems` to
`generateTestEnrichedObjectMetadataItemsMock` to make it clear this is
test-only enriched data
- Deletes `useLoadMockedObjectMetadataItems` hook (consolidated into
`useLoadMockedMinimalMetadata`)
- Ensures nothing destined for the metadata store computes
`readableFields`/`updatableFields` (preventing the localStorage bloat
from #18809)

## Type hierarchy (before → after)

**Before:**
```
ObjectMetadataItemsQuery → mapPaginated → ObjectMetadataItemWithRelated → enrich → ObjectMetadataItem
                                        → split → FlatObjectMetadataItem (store)
```

**After:**
```
ObjectMetadataItemsQuery → splitObjectMetadataGqlResponse → FlatObjectMetadataItem (store)
                         → mapPaginated + enrich (tests only) → EnrichedObjectMetadataItem
```

## Test plan

- [x] `npx nx typecheck twenty-front` passes
- [x] `npx nx test twenty-front` passes (767 suites, 4505 tests)
- [x] `npx nx lint twenty-front` passes
- [ ] CI checks pass


Made with [Cursor](https://cursor.com)
2026-03-22 15:53:47 +01:00
nitin ab881350b2 refactor: unify layout customization mode (record pages + navigation) (#18640)
### What

Unifies record page layout editing and navigation menu editing into a
single global "layout customization" session. Dashboard editing stays
separate.

  ### How it works

  **Two edit mode systems, one context-based read:**
- `isLayoutCustomizationModeEnabledState` -- global atom for record
pages + navigation
- `isDashboardInEditModeComponentState` -- dashboard-only, independent
per-component atom
- `PageLayoutEditModeProvider` -- context that dispatches to
`RecordPageLayoutEditModeProvider` (reads global atom) or
`DashboardPageLayoutEditModeProvider` (reads component atom), one
component per file

  **Session registry + independent atoms:**
- `activeCustomizationPageLayoutIdsState` -- accumulates page layout IDs
as user navigates during customization (`string[]`)
- Save/cancel iterate the ID list and read each layout's draft/persisted
atoms independently
- Follows the same pattern as `settingsRoleIdsState` +
`settingsDraftRoleFamilyState`

  **Unified UI:**
- `LayoutCustomizationBar` replaces the old `NavigationMenuEditModeBar`
- Enter once -- edit record layouts + navigation -- save/cancel
everything together
- `useSaveLayoutCustomization` orchestrates sequential save: navigation
draft -- page layouts -- field widget groups
- Error snackbar on partial save failure (with TODO for future atomic
server mutation)

  **Draft protection during customization:**
- `PageLayoutRelationWidgetsSyncEffect` guarded -- only updates
persisted state from server, skips draft/currentLayouts while
customization is active
- `useExecuteTasksOnAnyLocationChange` skips draft reset when
customization mode is enabled
  - Command execution blocked during layout customization

  ### Cleanup
- Deleted `NavigationMenuEditModeBar`,
`isNavigationMenuInEditModeState`,
`isPageLayoutInEditModeComponentState`,
`useIsGlobalLayoutCustomizationActive`
- `DraftPageLayout` type changed from `Omit` to `Pick` (explicit fields)
- Removed save/cancel from `DefaultRecordCommandMenuItemsConfig` (bar
handles it now)
  - Extracted `useSaveFieldsWidgetGroups` from save orchestration
- Split `PageLayoutEditModeProvider` into 3 separate files (one
component per file, Twenty convention)

  ### Known issues
- **Stale deleted widget after save (pre-existing on `main`)**: Delete
widget -- save -- exit customization -- Apollo cache stale -- sync
effect overwrites Jotai from stale data -- widget reappears until
refresh. Separate PR needed, likely tied to the planned server-side
`saveLayoutCustomization` atomic endpoint.

  ### Open questions
- **Module location**: Layout customization hooks/states live in `/app`
-- should they move to their own `modules/layout-customization/`?
- **Atomic server mutation**: All save mutations are on metadata schema
(`createNavigationMenuItem`, `deleteNavigationMenuItem`,
`updateNavigationMenuItem`, `updatePageLayoutWithTabsAndWidgets`,
`upsertFieldsWidget`). A single `saveLayoutCustomization` endpoint could
make saves truly atomic.


https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/036ef542-97f3-485b-a68f-3726002c81fb
2026-03-17 16:24:09 +01:00
Charles Bochet f1dfcfd163 refactor(twenty-front): reorganize NavigationMenuItem module into common/display/edit subfolders (#18691)
## Summary

- Reorganizes the `navigation-menu-item` frontend module from a flat
structure into `common/`, `display/`, and `edit/` subfolders with
type-specific subdirectories (`link/`, `folder/`, `object/`, `view/`,
`record/`)
- Every file is now in a leaf folder describing its type: `components/`,
`hooks/`, `utils/`, `types/`, or `constants/`
- Moves 14 NavigationMenuItem-related components out of
`object-metadata/` and `side-panel/pages/` into the
`navigation-menu-item` module where they belong
- Creates type-specific display utility functions (e.g.,
`getLinkNavigationMenuItemLabel`,
`getObjectNavigationMenuItemComputedLink`) to replace generic
switch-based functions
- Unifies the Favorites section drag-and-drop from `@hello-pangea/dnd`
to `@dnd-kit/react`, matching the Workspace section's DnD library
- Renames Favorites section components from `CurrentWorkspaceMember*` to
`Favorites*` for clarity
- Deletes unused `FavoritesDragDropProviderContent` and
`NavbarDragProvider`

## Test plan

- [x] `npx nx typecheck twenty-front` passes
- [x] `npx nx lint:diff-with-main twenty-front` passes (0 warnings, 0
errors)
- [x] `npx nx test twenty-front` passes (763 suites, 4467 tests)
- [ ] Verify favorites drag-and-drop still works in the UI (reorder
items, move between folders)
- [ ] Verify workspace edit mode drag-and-drop still works
- [ ] Verify "add to navigation" drag from command menu/side panel still
works
2026-03-17 06:46:50 +01:00
Weiko 00c3cd1051 Add system view fallback (#18536)
## Context
The goal is to add a "See records" button in all objects that would
redirect to that view (this will be done in a later PR). See screenshot
below.
<img width="665" height="312" alt="Screenshot 2026-03-10 at 15 54 36"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/6e23a75b-cff0-4d93-bce8-b5481b05c6f6"
/>

## Implementation
- If a view does not exist on an object, there is a **temporary**
fallback where the frontend creates the missing view as a custom view
when going over the object index page
- System objects are now surfaced but we don't want their records to be
editable, they will be readonly (mostly, all fields will be non-editable
except for their custom fields).
- We can't create a new record of a system object, some actions are also
hidden.
- The backend now rejects if you are trying to delete the last view of
an object
2026-03-11 13:48:02 +01:00
Abdul Rahman 5b28e59ca7 Navbar drag drop using dnd kit (#18288) 2026-03-08 20:25:50 +00:00
Charles Bochet b456f79167 Reduce leak between gql schema (#17878)
## Reduce type leakage between GraphQL schemas

### Why

Twenty runs two separate GraphQL schemas: **core** and **metadata**.
NestJS's `@nestjs/graphql` uses a global `TypeMetadataStorage` that
accumulates all decorated types across all modules. When each schema is
built, every registered type leaks into both schemas regardless of which
module it belongs to.

This means the core schema's generated TypeScript
(`generated/graphql.ts`) contained ~2,700 lines of types that only
belong to the metadata schema (and vice versa). This creates confusion
about type ownership, inflates generated code, and makes it harder to
reason about which API surface each schema actually exposes.

### How

**1. Patch `@nestjs/graphql` to support schema-scoped type resolution**

- **(Already done)** Added a `resolverSchemaScope` option to
`GqlModuleOptions`, allowing each schema to declare a scope (e.g.
`'metadata'`)
- `ResolversExplorerService` now filters resolvers by a
`RESOLVER_SCHEMA_SCOPE` metadata key, so each schema only sees its own
resolvers
- `GraphQLSchemaFactory` now performs a **reachability walk**
(`computeReachableTypes`) starting from scoped resolver return types and
arguments, only including types that are transitively referenced —
handling unions, interfaces, and prototype chains
- Type definition storage and orphaned reference registry are cleared
between schema builds to prevent cross-contamination

**2. Register `ClientConfig` as orphaned type in metadata schema**

Since `ClientConfig` is needed in the metadata schema but not directly
returned by a resolver, it's explicitly declared via
`buildSchemaOptions.orphanedTypes`.

**3. Regenerate frontend types and fix imports**

- `generated/graphql.ts` shrank by ~2,700 lines (types moved to where
they belong)
- `generated-metadata/graphql.ts` gained types like `ClientConfig` that
were previously missing
- ~500 frontend files updated to import from the correct generated file
2026-02-12 10:58:52 +01:00
Paul Rastoin 1128331cc1 Fix field item type tag (#16860)
# Introduction
This has been fixed on main already 1 hour ago, this PR now only passes
the field application id instead of the object applicationId that could
be different for example when creating a custom field on a standard
object

For the moment not introducing any logic around application integrity
directly and still relying on the isCustom and standardId definition
This will have to be refactored once we deprecate the standardId
2025-12-30 15:02:07 +00:00
Félix Malfait 4f1f0eb177 Redesign Object/Field tables (#16844)
Redesign the data model pages for more clarity / better distinction
between fields and relations
2025-12-30 09:49:55 +01:00
Paul Rastoin 8299488f21 Fix front data model edition + non nullable workspaceCustom application migration (#16016)
# Introduction
Two things:
- Enforcing non nullable workspace custom application Id for any
workspace
- Fixing front non editable data models following
https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/15911 that associate any custom
entities to an applicationId. The front was putting everything as
readonly when under an app ( we will have to handle the twenty standard
application in the future too )

## Fallback
### Migration
The non nullable migration will fail when released, that's why it's
being swallowed and re-run in an upgrade command post workspace custom
application creation for those that miss one. Allowing the migration to
pass in the end
The typeorm migration still need to exists for any new workspaces

### GetCurrentUser
In order to dynamically display isReadOnly in data model settings we're
fetching the workspaceCustomApplicationId through the `getCurrentUser`
If not fallback this endpoint would throw until we're handling existing
workspaces that do not have a custom workspace application
The fallback should be removed post release
2025-11-24 13:39:04 +00:00
martmull abde3c04ac 1630 extensibility twenty cli ability to create edit and delete fields (#15501)
As title

- adds decorators in twenty-sdk
- update twenty-cli load-manifest to it gets @FieldMetadata infos +
testing
- update twenty-server so it CRUD fields properly, using
universalIdentifier
- Fix UI so we can update managed objects records
- move FieldMetadata items from twenty-server to twenty-shared
2025-11-05 17:50:06 +01:00
martmull b16ab1b7c9 1518 extensibility front add an application section in settings (#15056)
Protected by IS_APPLICATION_ENABLED featureFlag

Add `Application` section in settings

<img width="301" height="137" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/ee53bdd2-36f6-45c6-8646-17b1e08abf00"
/>


A `settings/applications` route listing all installed applications

<img width="661" height="428" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/69d534c4-4e9e-452a-a3d9-ded0223bb457"
/>

Introduce a new Tag for application managed items

<img width="885" height="759" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/19767be5-61e5-4bd2-a51d-54ed9bfb1923"
/>



A `settings/applications/<application_id>` details setting page listing
all objects, serverlessFunctions and agents created by the application:

<img width="917" height="778" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/7fc056a6-1d73-4242-b2eb-6f8955d8597d"
/>

A `settings/applications/<application_id>/<serverless_function_id>`

<img width="905" height="652" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/56ca0021-26bf-42cb-9abf-34879f16050a"
/>

Add trigger tab in serverless function details (readonly for now)

<img width="899" height="724" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/5eeefa35-f2a4-4fd8-a640-7b5c5891f226"
/>

Set object, serverless and agent setting detail pages readonly for
managed items
<img width="1075" height="859" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/57c73d69-4980-47a2-b752-8dc5ab494530"
/>
<img width="648" height="582" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/5ad5f3f7-3bc3-4e40-870a-4981c6492524"
/>
<img width="982" height="692" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/7ad756c4-5d33-4a0a-9eb8-416c040362b9"
/>
<img width="1077" height="647" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e086b9f5-4062-4d10-82a9-4023de3cad3f"
/>
2025-10-15 17:13:29 +02:00
neo773 3ef94f6e8c Refactor read only object and fields (#13936)
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
2025-08-19 18:10:35 +02:00