Upgraded from 8.6.15 to 9.1.17 in two steps:
- 8.6.15 -> 9.0.0
- 9.0.0 -> 9.1.17
I had to disable `storybook-addon-cookie` since it is not supported for
Storybook 9. However, I do intend to upgrade to Storybook 10 when this
is merged, so we can replace the aforementioned add-on with this fork
specifically created to support Storybook 10 and above:
https://www.npmjs.com/package/@storybook-community/storybook-addon-cookie.
Additionally, once we upgrade to Version 10 successfully, I will start
looking into integrating the official Vitest add-on.
# Introduction
In this PR we've migrated `twenty-shared` from a `vite` app
[libary-mode](https://vite.dev/guide/build#library-mode) to a
[preconstruct](https://preconstruct.tools/) "atomic" application ( in
the future would like to introduce preconstruct to handle of all our
atomic dependencies such as `twenty-emails` `twenty-ui` etc it will be
integrated at the monorepo's root directly, would be to invasive in the
first, starting incremental via `twenty-shared`)
For more information regarding the motivations please refer to nor:
- https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/587
-
https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/281#issuecomment-2630949682
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/589
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/590
## How to test
In order to ease the review this PR will ship all the codegen at the
very end, the actual meaning full diff is `+2,411 −114`
In order to migrate existing dependent packages to `twenty-shared` multi
barrel new arch you need to run in local:
```sh
yarn tsx packages/twenty-shared/scripts/migrateFromSingleToMultiBarrelImport.ts && \
npx nx run-many -t lint --fix -p twenty-front twenty-ui twenty-server twenty-emails twenty-shared twenty-zapier
```
Note that `migrateFromSingleToMultiBarrelImport` is idempotent, it's atm
included in the PR but should not be merged. ( such as codegen will be
added before merging this script will be removed )
## Misc
- related opened issue preconstruct
https://github.com/preconstruct/preconstruct/issues/617
## Closed related PR
- https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/11028
- https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/10993
- https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/10960
## Upcoming enhancement: ( in others dedicated PRs )
- 1/ refactor generate barrel to export atomic module instead of `*`
- 2/ generate barrel own package with several files and tests
- 3/ Migration twenty-ui the same way
- 4/ Use `preconstruct` at monorepo global level
## Conclusion
As always any suggestions are welcomed !
# Introduction
Avoid having multiple `isDefined` definition across our pacakges
Also avoid importing `isDefined` from `twenty-ui` which exposes a huge
barrel for a such little util function
## In a nutshell
Removed own `isDefined.ts` definition from `twenty-ui` `twenty-front`
and `twenty-server` to move it to `twenty-shared`.
Updated imports for each packages, and added explicit dependencies to
`twenty-shared` if not already in place
Related PR https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/9941
- make invitation and reset password available on every page
- add a sleep after setKeyPair as tokens are sometimes not updated when
redirecting to Index
- refactor sleep
This PR introduces many improvements over the new profiling story
feature, with new tests and some refactor with main :
- Added use-context-selector for getting value faster in display fields
and created useRecordFieldValue() hook and RecordValueSetterEffect to
synchronize states
- Added performance test command in CI
- Refactored ExpandableList drill-downs with FieldFocusContext
- Refactored field button icon logic into getFieldButtonIcon util
- Added RelationFieldDisplay perf story
- Added RecordTableCell perf story
- First split test of useField.. hook with useRelationFieldDisplay()
- Fixed problem with set cell soft focus
- Isolated logic between display / soft focus and edit mode in the
related components to optimize performances for display mode.
- Added warmupRound config for performance story decorator
- Added variance in test reporting
This PR introduces a Profiling feature for our story book tests.
It also implements a new CI job : front-sb-test-performance, that only
runs stories suffixed with `.perf.stories.tsx`
## How it works
It allows to wrap any component into an array of React Profiler
components that will run tests many times to have the most replicable
average render time possible.
It is simply used by calling the new `getProfilingStory` util.
Internally it creates a defined number of tests, separated by an
arbitrary waiting time to allow the CPU to give more stable results.
It will do 3 warm-up and 3 finishing runs of tests because the first and
last renders are always a bit erratic, so we want to measure only the
runs in-between.
On the UI side it gives a table of results :
<img width="515" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/assets/26528466/273d2d91-26da-437a-890e-778cb6c1f993">
On the programmatic side, it stores the result in a div that can then be
parsed by the play fonction of storybook, to expect a defined threshold.
```tsx
play: async ({ canvasElement }) => {
await findByTestId(
canvasElement,
'profiling-session-finished',
{},
{ timeout: 60000 },
);
const profilingReport = getProfilingReportFromDocument(canvasElement);
if (!isDefined(profilingReport)) {
return;
}
const p95result = profilingReport?.total.p95;
expect(
p95result,
`Component render time is more than p95 threshold (${p95ThresholdInMs}ms)`,
).toBeLessThan(p95ThresholdInMs);
},
```
Charles Bochet