## Problem
The ESLint rule `graphql-resolvers-should-be-guarded` introduced in
#15392 was failing on main because the guard `SettingsPermissionsGuard`
had inconsistent naming.
## Root Cause
The guard was named `SettingsPermissionsGuard` (with an 's') which was
inconsistent with other permission guards:
- ✅ `CustomPermissionGuard`
- ✅ `NoPermissionGuard`
- ✅ `ImpersonatePermissionGuard`
- ❌ `SettingsPermissionsGuard` (inconsistent!)
The ESLint rule checks if guard names end with `PermissionGuard`, but
`SettingsPermissionsGuard` ends with `sGuard`, so it wasn't recognized
as a permission guard.
## Solution
Renamed the guard to be consistent with the naming convention:
1. ✅ Renamed file: `settings-permissions.guard.ts` →
`settings-permission.guard.ts`
2. ✅ Renamed export: `SettingsPermissionsGuard` →
`SettingsPermissionGuard`
3. ✅ Renamed internal class: `SettingsPermissionsMixin` →
`SettingsPermissionMixin`
4. ✅ Updated all 122 references across 44 files in the codebase
5. ✅ Renamed test file: `settings-permissions.guard.spec.ts` →
`settings-permission.guard.spec.ts`
## Testing
- ✅ `npx nx run twenty-server:lint` passes
- ✅ `npx nx run twenty-server:typecheck` passes
- ✅ No references to the old name remain in the codebase
- ✅ All previously failing resolver files now pass ESLint validation
## Related
Fixes issues introduced in #15392
## Overview
This PR strengthens our permission system by introducing more granular
role-based access control across the platform.
## Changes
### New Permissions Added
- **Applications** - Control who can install and manage applications
- **Layouts** - Control who can customize page layouts and UI structure
- **AI** - Control access to AI features and agents
- **Upload File** - Separate permission for file uploads
- **Download File** - Separate permission for file downloads (frontend
visibility)
### Security Enhancements
- Implemented whitelist-based validation for workspace field updates
- Added explicit permission guards to core entity resolvers
- Enhanced ESLint rule to enforce permission checks on all mutations
- Created `CustomPermissionGuard` and `NoPermissionGuard` for better
code documentation
### Affected Components
- Core entity resolvers: webhooks, files, domains, applications,
layouts, postgres credentials
- Workspace update mutations now use whitelist validation
- Settings UI updated with new permission controls
### Developer Experience
- ESLint now catches missing permission guards during development
- Explicit guard markers make permission requirements clear in code
review
- Comprehensive test coverage for new permission logic
## Testing
- ✅ All TypeScript type checks pass
- ✅ ESLint validation passes
- ✅ New permission guards properly enforced
- ✅ Frontend UI displays new permissions correctly
## Migration Notes
Existing workspaces will need to assign the new permissions to roles as
needed. By default, all new permissions are set to `false` for non-admin
roles.
closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1418
Tested :
- findOne on Rest and Gql
### Vision
#### Common
- Common is kind of renamed Gql base resolver
- Common handles args (filter, values, ...) validation
- Common accepts depth or raw gql selected fields to compute
selectedFields
- Common is directly called by each CommonQueries (findOne, ...)
service, which extend CommonBaseQuery service
- Common sequence :
| - Parse & Validate args (args-handlers, to create)
| - Build query (query-parsers : currently in gql-query-parsers, to
move)
| - Execute query
| - Fetch relation + format
#### Rest
- Simple parsing (without metadata validation)
- Calling Common API
- Simple rest response formatting
#### Gql
- Calling Common API
- Renamed `WorkflowActionAdapter` to `ToolExecutorWorkflowAction`
- Renamed `settingPermission` table to `permissionFlag` and `setting`
column to `flag`
- Decoupled the send email logic from workflows to tools
- Add new `Tools Permission` section in FE
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix@twenty.com>
We must separate the concept of hydratation which happens at the request
level (take the token and pass auth/user context), from the concept of
authorization which happens at the query/endpoint/mutation level.
Previously, hydratation exemption happened at the operation name level
which is not correct because the operation name is meaningless and
optional. Still this gave an impression of security by enforcing a
blacklist. So in this PR we introduce linting rule that aim to achieve a
similar behavior, now every api method has to have a guard. That way if
and endpoint is not protected by AuthUserGuard or AuthWorspaceGuard,
then it has to be stated explicitly next to its code.
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
## Context
Now that we can update role settings permissions, we need to reflect
that on the FE as well (hiding/showing nav items + redirection logic).
Feature flag check here is not really needed because since not having
any setting permission will result in the same behavior as Permission
V1.
This PR updates the resolvers to return settings permissions of the
current user
Closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/526
(for reminder:
1. Make defaultRoleId non-nullable for an active workspace
2. Remove permissions V1 feature flag
3. Set member role as default role for new workspaces
About 1.:
An active workspace's defaultRoleId should never be null.
We can't rely on a simple postgres NOT NULL constraint as defaultRoleId
will always be initially null when the workspace is first created since
the roles do not exist at that time.
Let's add a more complex rule to ensure that
About 3.:
In the first phase of our deploy of permissions, we chose to assign
admin role to all existing users, not to break any existing behavior
with the introduction of the feature (= existing users have less rights
than before).
As we deploy permissions to all existing and future workspaces, let's
set the member role as default role for future workspaces.
)
# Introduction
In this PR we've migrated `twenty-shared` from a `vite` app
[libary-mode](https://vite.dev/guide/build#library-mode) to a
[preconstruct](https://preconstruct.tools/) "atomic" application ( in
the future would like to introduce preconstruct to handle of all our
atomic dependencies such as `twenty-emails` `twenty-ui` etc it will be
integrated at the monorepo's root directly, would be to invasive in the
first, starting incremental via `twenty-shared`)
For more information regarding the motivations please refer to nor:
- https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/587
-
https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/281#issuecomment-2630949682
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/589
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/590
## How to test
In order to ease the review this PR will ship all the codegen at the
very end, the actual meaning full diff is `+2,411 −114`
In order to migrate existing dependent packages to `twenty-shared` multi
barrel new arch you need to run in local:
```sh
yarn tsx packages/twenty-shared/scripts/migrateFromSingleToMultiBarrelImport.ts && \
npx nx run-many -t lint --fix -p twenty-front twenty-ui twenty-server twenty-emails twenty-shared twenty-zapier
```
Note that `migrateFromSingleToMultiBarrelImport` is idempotent, it's atm
included in the PR but should not be merged. ( such as codegen will be
added before merging this script will be removed )
## Misc
- related opened issue preconstruct
https://github.com/preconstruct/preconstruct/issues/617
## Closed related PR
- https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/11028
- https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/10993
- https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/10960
## Upcoming enhancement: ( in others dedicated PRs )
- 1/ refactor generate barrel to export atomic module instead of `*`
- 2/ generate barrel own package with several files and tests
- 3/ Migration twenty-ui the same way
- 4/ Use `preconstruct` at monorepo global level
## Conclusion
As always any suggestions are welcomed !
In this PR
- closing https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/313
- adding permission gates on workspace settings and security settings
- adding integration tests for each of the protected setting and
security
Adding SettingsPermissionsGuard to execute permission check.
The guard is added directly in resolver, either at resolver level (ex:
roles) or resolver-endpoint level (ex: metadata). this can be challenged
!
Update feature flag handling by mapping input keys to enum values. This
ensures compatibility and prevents potential runtime errors when
updating workspace feature flags.
## Summary
- [x] Remove defaultWorkspace in user
- [x] Remove all occurrence of defaultWorkspace and defaultWorkspaceId
- [x] Improve activate workspace flow
- [x] Improve security on social login
- [x] Add `ImpersonateGuard`
- [x] Allow to use impersonation with couple `User/Workspace`
- [x] Prevent unexpected reload on activate workspace
- [x] Scope login token with workspaceId
Fix https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/9033#event-15714863042
## Summary
Add support for multi-workspace feature and adjust configurations and
states accordingly.
- Introduced new state isMultiWorkspaceEnabledState.
- Updated ClientConfigProviderEffect component to handle
multi-workspace.
- Modified GraphQL schema and queries to include multi-workspace related
configurations.
- Adjusted server environment variables and their respective
documentation to support multi-workspace toggle.
- Updated server-side logic to handle new multi-workspace configurations
and conditions.
From PR: #6626Resolves#6763Resolves#6055Resolves#6782
## GTK
I retain the 'Invite by link' feature to prevent any breaking changes.
We could make the invitation by link optional through an admin setting,
allowing users to rely solely on personal invitations.
## Todo
- [x] Add an expiration date to an invitation
- [x] Allow to renew an invitation to postpone the expiration date
- [x] Refresh the UI
- [x] Add the new personal token in the link sent to new user
- [x] Display an error if a user tries to use an expired invitation
- [x] Display an error if a user uses another mail than the one in the
invitation
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
In this PR:
1. Refactor guards to avoid duplicated queries: WorkspaceAuthGuard and
UserAuthGuard only check for existence of workspace and user in the
request without querying the database
Félix Malfait