23f5ba9ebfb5bca64918dd22393a018fd9d5eefb
6 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Félix Malfait
|
23f5ba9ebf |
feat: add resizable kanban column width (#21828)
## What & why Lets users resize the columns of a Kanban (record board) view. Requested by a user; the design avoids the "ragged board" problem by making the width a **single shared value**. ## Behaviour - A drag handle appears on the right edge of every column header. - Because all columns read **one** width value, dragging any handle resizes **every** column together — they can never end up mismatched. - Width is clamped between **150px** and **400px** (default **200px**). - The width is **persisted per view** and restored on reload. ## Approach **Backend** — a new nullable `View.kanbanColumnWidth` field, threaded through the existing view-level setting pattern (the same one `kanbanAggregateOperation` / `shouldHideEmptyGroups` use), so it gets create/update/manifest/override support for free: - entity column + `ViewOverrides` + `@WasIntroducedInUpgrade` - `CreateViewInput` / `UpdateViewInput` (`Int`, `@Min(150)`/`@Max(400)`) + `ViewDTO` - flat-view editable properties, entity-properties config, compare-type, standard-view + manifest converters - a fast instance command adding the `core.view` column **Frontend** — the value hydrates into a view-scoped atom and drives a single CSS variable set on the board container, which both column headers and bodies read. Live dragging only writes that CSS variable (no per-move React re-render); the final width is committed to the atom and persisted via `updateView` on pointer-up. ## Nullability / defaults `kanbanColumnWidth` is nullable — `null` means "never resized" and the UI falls back to the 200px default, so existing rows need no backfill. ## Validation - `nx typecheck twenty-server` ✅ and `nx typecheck twenty-front` ✅ - `nx lint:diff-with-main twenty-server` ✅; frontend lint fixes applied (split constants to one-per-file, removed `useRef`-for-state in favour of `useState`). - Draft pending a final green CI run (the dev container reclaimed `node_modules` mid-session; re-running locally). ## Test plan - [ ] Drag a kanban column edge → all columns resize together, clamped 150–400px - [ ] Reload → width persists for that view; other views unaffected - [ ] A view that was never resized still renders at 200px https://claude.ai/code/session_016Qe6oDBkhVbrq2QkXBJ5nE --- _Generated by [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code/session_016Qe6oDBkhVbrq2QkXBJ5nE)_ <!-- This is an auto-generated description by cubic. --> <a href="https://cubic.dev/pr/twentyhq/twenty/pull/21828?utm_source=github" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-no-image-dialog="true"><picture><source media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)" srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"><source media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)" srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-light.svg"><img alt="Review in cubic" src="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"></picture></a> <!-- End of auto-generated description by cubic. --> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
neo773
|
616d58bc7e |
messaging: gmail folder backfill (#21753)
demo https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a157cee1-a8fa-4050-af1b-c31a83fb75da /closes #17095 <!-- This is an auto-generated description by cubic. --> <a href="https://cubic.dev/pr/twentyhq/twenty/pull/21753?utm_source=github" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-no-image-dialog="true"><picture><source media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)" srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"><source media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)" srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-light.svg"><img alt="Review in cubic" src="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"></picture></a> <!-- End of auto-generated description by cubic. --> |
||
|
Etienne
|
d99e479be8 |
feat(billing) - facilitate top up in ai chat (#21645)
Today, when a trialing user hits their AI usage cap inside the Ask AI chat, ending the trial bounces them to the Stripe billing portal (and, for card-less users, loses their place in the conversation). This PR makes activating a paid plan / topping up credits feel seamless from within the chat: Trial users with a card on file activate their subscription in place, without leaving the app. Trial users without a card are sent to the Stripe payment-method portal and, on return, the trial is ended automatically and they're dropped back into the exact Ask AI thread they came from. Credit-exhaustion and trial banners now reflect whether a payment method exists (Add Credit Card vs Subscribe Now / End Trial Period) and upgrade inline via a confirmation modal instead of redirecting to Settings. Uploading Screen Recording 2026-06-16 at 07.51.12.mov… https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/4ea77273-da63-4b32-b6f1-5ac9e9560651 <!-- This is an auto-generated description by cubic. --> <a href="https://cubic.dev/pr/twentyhq/twenty/pull/21645?utm_source=github" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-no-image-dialog="true"><picture><source media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)" srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"><source media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)" srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-light.svg"><img alt="Review in cubic" src="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"></picture></a> <!-- End of auto-generated description by cubic. --> |
||
|
Thomas Trompette
|
105f9565a5 |
feat(workflow): surface manual-trigger payload + metadata in variable picker (#21692)
## Summary Step 2 of the manual-trigger output schema restructuring (expand → display → migrate → contract). Builds on the now-merged #21676 (which expanded the runtime payload to serve `payload` and `metadata` siblings at the trigger root). This PR **surfaces** those in the variable picker as nested, expandable nodes: - `trigger.payload.{record fields}` — the record(s) that triggered the run - `trigger.metadata.workspaceMemberId` — who triggered it The flat root fields (`trigger.id`, etc.) remain available, so existing saved variable references keep working until a later migration phase moves them. ### Changes - **twenty-shared**: metadata/payload label constants + `build-manual-trigger-metadata-node` util + barrel exports. - **twenty-front**: `computeStepOutputSchema` MANUAL branch now nests `payload` (RecordNode for SINGLE_RECORD, array Node for BULK_RECORDS, omitted for GLOBAL) and `metadata`; `ManualTriggerOutputSchema` type updated to `{ payload?; metadata }`. - **twenty-server**: `computeTriggerOutputSchemaFromAvailability` mirrors the same nested shape for server-side validation. The key is `metadata` (not `_metadata`) — custom fields can't start with `_`, so collision risk was deemed acceptable. ## Test plan - [x] `npx nx build twenty-shared` - [x] `computeStepOutputSchema` unit tests pass (55) - [x] Manual: create a manual-trigger workflow (GLOBAL / single-record / bulk), confirm the picker shows `payload` and `metadata` as expandable folders and that selecting a field yields `{{trigger.payload.<field>}}` / `{{trigger.metadata.workspaceMemberId}}` > Note: server typecheck has pre-existing unrelated failures on main (Stripe billing mocks, gmail mocks); none touch workflow files. <!-- This is an auto-generated description by cubic. --> <a href="https://cubic.dev/pr/twentyhq/twenty/pull/21692?utm_source=github" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-no-image-dialog="true"><picture><source media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)" srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"><source media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)" srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-light.svg"><img alt="Review in cubic" src="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"></picture></a> <!-- End of auto-generated description by cubic. --> |
||
|
Weiko
|
3ee93b5ec9 |
feat(server): add isSystemSideEffect & merge createOneObject/createOneField side-effect migrations (#21673)
## Context When an object is created via the metadata API, `createOneObject` creates its side-effect entities (INDEX view + viewFields, indexes, navigation menu item, "go to" command menu item, record-page fields view, page layout/tabs/widgets) across **three separate `validateBuildAndRunWorkspaceMigration` calls**, purely because the protection behavior (mutations → overrides, delete → deactivate, reset → reactivate) was keyed on *"owned by the standard app"*, forcing the side effects into batches with different application owners. This misrepresents ownership and breaks atomicity. This PR separates two orthogonal concepts: - **Ownership** (`applicationId`), the true owner: the caller's application (the workspace custom app today, 3rd-party apps later). - **Protection** (`isSystemSideEffect`), the row was generated by the system, so user mutations route to overrides, deletion becomes deactivation, and reset restores defaults. Once side effects are re-owned to the caller, the old `applicationId === standardApp` check can no longer tell an original side-effect row from a user-added one so a dedicated `isSystemSideEffect` flag carries the protection instead. This is **PR 1 of 2** (forward-only). It makes newly created objects and fields correct; existing workspaces are handled by a follow-up backfill (see *Out of scope*). ## What this PR does - **`isSystemSideEffect` column** on the 8 affected entities (`view`, `viewField`, `indexMetadata`, `commandMenuItem`, `pageLayout`, `pageLayoutTab`, `pageLayoutWidget`, `fieldMetadata`), with `@WasIntroducedInUpgrade` + an entry in the flat-entity property configuration (`toCompare: true`, read-only). - **Single atomic migration in `createOneObject`**: the three `validateBuildAndRunWorkspaceMigration` calls are merged into one, owned by the caller (`resolvedOwnerFlatApplication`) and the record-page view/fields, page layout, and navigation command item are re-owned to the caller and flagged `isSystemSideEffect: true`. `buildNavigationFlatCommandMenuItem` is parameterized with `applicationUniversalIdentifier` (no longer hardcoded to the standard app). - **Field-creation side effects** (`createManyFields`/`createOneField` already run as a single caller-owned migration, so no re-ownership/merge was needed): the auto-created viewField is flagged `isSystemSideEffect: true`, and a new field now also propagates to the object's **INDEX/table view** (added there as a **hidden** column, `isVisible: false`) in addition to the record-page FIELDS widget. The INDEX view is targeted directly by `key = INDEX` (it is not a page-layout widget), de-duplicated per `(viewId, fieldMetadataUniversalIdentifier)` to respect the per-view unique index. The unique-field index is likewise flagged the inverse relation field stays unflagged (`isSystem: false`). - **Protection predicate** extended: `isCallerOverridingEntity` and the removal/reset split strategies now treat `isSystemSideEffect` rows as protected even when caller-owned (route to overrides / deactivate / reset) and the page-layout-reset guards allow resetting flagged entities. - **Standard compute maps** set the flag consistently so a re-sync produces no diff (standard-object side effects stay `false`; per-object nav command items and custom-object base fields are `true`). - **Read-only GraphQL exposure** of `isSystemSideEffect` on the view / view-field / page-layout / tab / widget / command-menu-item DTOs (not exposed on create/update inputs). => Todo: needs to take this new flag into account. This is fine for now because isSystem remains on object/field. - **Fast instance command** (`2-14`) adding the 8 columns (`NOT NULL DEFAULT false`). ## Scope decisions - **`pageLayout` is not an `OverridableEntity`**, its own row has nothing user-overridable (all customization lives on tabs/widgets). It's dual-purpose (`RECORD_PAGE` side-effect vs. user `DASHBOARD`), so it gets `isSystemSideEffect` for protection only, no `overrides` jsonb. - **`navigationMenuItem` is out of scope.**: Those are side effects only for the metadata API and not marked as "system" (they can be deleted/updated etc...) - **`viewFieldGroup` is not a side effect**, it's only created via the explicit view-field-group API, never by object/field creation, so it gets no flag. ## Out of scope (follow-ups) **PR 2** — slow per-workspace backfill (re-own + flag existing side effects, recreate missing ones) and deterministic v5 identifiers for base fields / pageLayout / tab. <!-- This is an auto-generated description by cubic. --> <a href="https://cubic.dev/pr/twentyhq/twenty/pull/21673?utm_source=github" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-no-image-dialog="true"><picture><source media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)" srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"><source media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)" srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-light.svg"><img alt="Review in cubic" src="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"></picture></a> <!-- End of auto-generated description by cubic. --> |
||
|
neo773
|
d8d5991977 |
fix(messaging): honor IMAP/SMTP encryption setting instead of inferring it from the port (#21562)
This pull request makes the IMAP and SMTP encryption setting actually honor what the user selects. As per spec there's 3 modes: SSL/TLS (implicit TLS from the start), STARTTLS (it will attempt TLS but if the server doesn't support it, it gracefully falls back to plaintext), NONE (plaintext) Current implementation had a boolean flag for this, this replaces it with the 3 modes Upgrade command to migrate all existing accounts, to not risk breaking anyone's existing account in production we map each account to the mode that matches its current behavior, so nothing changes on the wire /closes #21300 <!-- This is an auto-generated description by cubic. --> <a href="https://cubic.dev/pr/twentyhq/twenty/pull/21562?utm_source=github" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-no-image-dialog="true"><picture><source media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)" srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"><source media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)" srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-light.svg"><img alt="Review in cubic" src="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"></picture></a> <!-- End of auto-generated description by cubic. --> --------- Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com> |
