## Context
We've recently introduced a new workspace cache service which now acts
as a cache access and local storage for all workspace related data,
deprecating the individual specific services.
- Better performance through multiple caching/fetching strategies
- Consistent data access patterns across the codebase
- Reduced redis queries through MGET/MSET/PIPELINE with multiple cache
keys
# Introduction
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1930
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1929
Migrating role and roleTarget entities to the v2 core engine, allowing
v2 caching leverage and allow migrating agent to v2 that needs role
target in prior
After agent we should be able to pass twenty standard app totally though
workspace migration
## Role target assignation
Please note that role target have 3 creation entrypoints:
- Agent
- User workspace
- ApiKey
Refactored all 3 of them to pass through a new role-target.service.ts
that consumes the v2 under the hood.
---------
Co-authored-by: Weiko <corentin@twenty.com>
## Summary
This PR introduces a comprehensive agent evaluation system and refactors
the AI module structure for better organization.
## Key Changes
### 🎯 Agent Evaluation System
- Added **Agent Turn Evaluation** entities, DTOs, and database schema
- New GraphQL mutations: `evaluateAgentTurn` and `runEvaluationInput`
- Added `evaluationInputs` field to Agent entity for storing test inputs
- New `AgentTurnGraderService` for automatic turn evaluation
- Added evaluation UI with new **Evals** and **Logs** tabs in agent
detail pages
### 🏗️ Entity & Module Refactoring
- Renamed `AgentChatMessage` → `AgentMessage` for clarity
- Consolidated chat entities: `AgentMessage`, `AgentTurn`, and
`AgentChatThread`
- Reorganized AI modules under `ai/` subdirectory structure
- Updated imports across codebase to reflect new module paths
### 🤖 New Agents & Roles
- Added **Dashboard Builder Agent** for dashboard creation and
management
- Added **Dashboard Manager Role** with appropriate permissions
- Updated role permissions to be more granular (users vs agents vs API
keys)
### 🔐 Permission System Updates
- Added `HTTP_REQUEST_TOOL` permission flag
- Updated Workflow Manager role permissions (restricted tool access)
- Enhanced permission flag types to differentiate between user/agent/API
key contexts
- Added `isRelevantForAgents`, `isRelevantForApiKeys`,
`isRelevantForUsers` to permission flags
### 📨 Message Role Enhancement
- Added `system` role to `AgentMessageRole` enum (alongside
user/assistant)
- Updated message handling to support system prompts
### 🎨 UI/UX Improvements
- New tabs in agent detail: **Evals** and **Logs**
- Added turn detail page: `/ai/agents/:agentId/turns/:turnId`
- Fixed text overflow in `SettingsListItemCardContent`
- Updated role applicability labels ("Assignable to Workspace Members")
### 🛠️ Technical Improvements
- Fixed Zod schema validation for UUID and Date fields (use string
validators)
- Updated `ToolRegistryService` to properly register HTTP tool with
permission flag
- Enhanced error handling in agent execution services
- Updated database migrations for new entity schema
## Database Migrations
- `1764210000000-add-system-role-to-agent-message.ts`
- `1764220000000-add-evaluation-inputs-to-agent.ts`
- `1764200000000-add-agent-turn-evaluation.ts`
- `1764100000000-refactor-agent-chat-entities.ts`
## Testing
- [ ] Agent evaluation flow tested
- [ ] Dashboard Builder agent tested
- [ ] Permission system validated
- [ ] UI tabs and navigation tested
- [ ] Database migrations run successfully
## Breaking Changes
⚠️ **Entity Rename**: `AgentChatMessage` renamed to `AgentMessage` -
GraphQL queries need updating
## Related Issues
<!-- Link any related issues here -->
## Screenshots
<!-- Add screenshots if applicable -->
- Users with a single workspace are allowed to update their email across
`core.user` and `workspace_xyz.workspaceMember`.
- The latter happens asynchronously (built it like this for non-blocking
with multiple workspaces), but since we restrict the email update
functionality to a single user, we can also update the email in
workspaceMember synchronously - I left asynchronous there to receive
feedback on whether we should move to synchronous or not.
- Merged main and resolved conflicts to ensure we use the
`SettingsPermissionGuard` and the updated `workspace.service.ts` code.
One edge-case that I was trying to communicate on Discord:
Say that an admin is a member of multiple workspaces. Therefore, they
can allow roles with PROFILE_INFORMATION permission to update their
email.
<p align="center">
<img width="553" height="115" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/80382b1f-a9e3-4dac-b606-c2defeb2c330"
/>
</p>
However, since the admin is part of multiple workspaces, he/she cannot
even update own email - the field stays disabled, leading to some
confusion.
<p align="center">
<img width="545" height="255" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/5e6d27db-c9a8-4d5e-9ab6-65c77beae5b4"
/>
</p>
However, the workspace can have another member with admin role or some
other role that has PROFILE_INFORMATION permission flag. That user will
be and should be allowed to update email, so we cannot hide `email` from
dropdown options.
<p align="center">
<img width="585" height="283" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a670d3ac-cf48-4865-a425-b909093d8420"
/>
</p>
The behavior is fine imo, just a little confusing for members with more
than one workspace.
I have also tested the flow by signing up to YC workspace with my org
google account (twenty.com), then changing email to my personal address.
- After changing, I need to login using Google with my personal account
to access YC workspace again.
- If I login using Google with org google account (twenty.com), a new
user account is created.
This behavior is consistent with Notion and Linear.
Finally, as for the verification of email, the user is asked to verify
email while they're logged in, but just in case they logout without
verifying, the next login would force them to verify their email in the
email/password flow.
However, for Social/SSO, they must verify before they logout or else
they'd have to contact support for assistance. I have not looked into
how to show verification screen while logging in via Social/SSO yet, but
if that's something critical for completeness here, I shall revisit it.
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix@twenty.com>
## Overview
This PR strengthens our permission system by introducing more granular
role-based access control across the platform.
## Changes
### New Permissions Added
- **Applications** - Control who can install and manage applications
- **Layouts** - Control who can customize page layouts and UI structure
- **AI** - Control access to AI features and agents
- **Upload File** - Separate permission for file uploads
- **Download File** - Separate permission for file downloads (frontend
visibility)
### Security Enhancements
- Implemented whitelist-based validation for workspace field updates
- Added explicit permission guards to core entity resolvers
- Enhanced ESLint rule to enforce permission checks on all mutations
- Created `CustomPermissionGuard` and `NoPermissionGuard` for better
code documentation
### Affected Components
- Core entity resolvers: webhooks, files, domains, applications,
layouts, postgres credentials
- Workspace update mutations now use whitelist validation
- Settings UI updated with new permission controls
### Developer Experience
- ESLint now catches missing permission guards during development
- Explicit guard markers make permission requirements clear in code
review
- Comprehensive test coverage for new permission logic
## Testing
- ✅ All TypeScript type checks pass
- ✅ ESLint validation passes
- ✅ New permission guards properly enforced
- ✅ Frontend UI displays new permissions correctly
## Migration Notes
Existing workspaces will need to assign the new permissions to roles as
needed. By default, all new permissions are set to `false` for non-admin
roles.
**Before**
- any user with workpace_members permission was able to remove a user
from their workspace. This triggered the deletion of workspaceMember +
of userWorkspace, but did not delete the user (even if they had no
workspace left) nor the roleTarget (acts as junction between role and
userWorkspace) which was left with a userWorkspaceId pointing to
nothing. This is because roleTarget points to userWorkspaceId but the
foreign key constraint was not implemented
- any user could delete their own account. This triggered the deletion
of all their workspaceMembers, but not of their userWorkspace nor their
user nor the roleTarget --> we have orphaned userWorkspace, not
technically but product wise - a userWorkspace without a workspaceMember
does not make sense
So the problems are
- we have some roleTargets pointing to non-existing userWorkspaceId
(which caused https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/14608 )
- we have userWorkspaces that should not exist and that have no
workspaceMember counterpart
- it is not possible for a user to leave a workspace by themselves, they
can only leave all workspaces at once, except if they are being removed
from the workspace by another user
**Now**
- if a user has multiple workspaces, they are given the possibility to
leave one workspace while remaining in the others (we show two buttons:
Leave workspace and Delete account buttons). if a user has just one
workspace, they only see Delete account
- when a user leaves a workspace, we delete their workspaceMember,
userWorkspace and roleTarget. If they don't belong to any other
workspace we also soft-delete their user
- soft-deleted users get hard deleted after 30 days thanks to a cron
- we have two commands to clean the orphans roleTarget and userWorkspace
(TODO: query db to see how many must be run)
**Next**
- once the commands have been run, we can implement and introduce the
foreign key constraint on roleTarget
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/14608
Closes [Core Issue
#1772](https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1772).
<!-- CURSOR_SUMMARY -->
---
> [!NOTE]
> Introduces SSO bypass with a new permission flag and workspace-level
provider toggles, enabling permitted users to log in via
Google/Microsoft/Password when SSO-only, with backend enforcement and
frontend UI/hooks/queries.
>
> - **Backend**:
> - **Permission & Enforcement**: Add `PermissionFlagType.SSO_BYPASS`;
update `AuthService` to allow login via non-SSO providers when workspace
bypass is enabled and user has `SSO_BYPASS`.
> - **Workspace Model**: Add `isGoogleAuthBypassEnabled`,
`isMicrosoftAuthBypassEnabled`, `isPasswordAuthBypassEnabled`
(migration, entity, update input, service validation).
> - **Public API**: Extend `PublicWorkspaceDataOutput` with
`authBypassProviders`; resolver computes it; permissions defaults
include `SSO_BYPASS`.
> - **Frontend**:
> - **GraphQL/State**: Generate new types/fields; add
`authBypassProviders` to `GetPublicWorkspaceDataByDomain`; new states
`workspaceAuthBypassProvidersState`, `workspaceBypassModeState`.
> - **Auth UI/Logic**: Add `useWorkspaceBypass`; update sign-in form and
footer to offer "Bypass SSO" and use merged providers when enabled;
remove auto-redirect when single SSO.
> - **Settings**: Add Security section to toggle bypass methods per
provider; conditionally show Change Password via `useCanChangePassword`.
> - **Tests/Mocks**: Update mocks and tests to include bypass
flags/providers.
>
> <sup>Written by [Cursor
Bugbot](https://cursor.com/dashboard?tab=bugbot) for commit
8c393b2bad387fb6e8b8f40027f8637dd6e85723. This will update automatically
on new commits. Configure
[here](https://cursor.com/dashboard?tab=bugbot).</sup>
<!-- /CURSOR_SUMMARY -->
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
Implements permission intersection (AND logic) to prevent permission
escalation when agents act on behalf of users.
### Changes:
- **Permission Intersection**: Operations requiring both user AND agent
permissions
- **RoleContext Type**: Unified type supporting single `roleId` or
multiple `roleIds` for intersection
- **CRUD Services**: Updated to accept `roleContext` for granular
permission control
- **Agent Integration**: Chat agents now use user + agent role
intersection for all operations
- **ORM Layer**: Enhanced `getRepository` to support multi-role
permission checks
### Related:
- Part 2 of ["Acting on behalf of user" concept
PR](https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/15103)
[Closes#1661](https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1661)
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
Following https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/14306 , working on the
deprecation of objectRecordsPermissions + renaming of objectPermissions
-> objectsPermissions
In this PR
- Removal of objectRecordsPermissions (was not used in the FE any
longer)
- Addition of objectsPermissions, same as objectPermission but renamed.
objectPermission is no longer used in the FE.
Next step
- Remove unused objectPermissions
We want to update UserWorkspacePermissions from
```
export type UserWorkspacePermissions = {
permissionFlags: Record<PermissionFlagType, boolean>;
objectRecordsPermissions: Record<PermissionsOnAllObjectRecords, boolean>;
objectPermissions: ObjectsPermissionsDeprecated;
};
```
to
```
export type UserWorkspacePermissions = {
permissionFlags: Record<PermissionFlagType, boolean>;
objectsPermissions: ObjectsPermissions;
};
```
`ObjectsPermissionsDeprecated` and `ObjectsPermissions` are actually
very similar, they only have different key names (`canRead` vs
`canReadObjectRecords`)
To avoid brutal breaking changes, we will proceed in multiple steps:
1. This PR: adapt FE so it does not call objectRecordsPermissions
anymore + add the new objectsPermissions to UserWorkspacePermissions
without calling it yet in the FE
2. Remove objectRecordsPermissions in BE + use objectsPermissions in FE
instead of objectPermissions
3. Remove objectPermissions
In this PR
- Introduction of readableFields and updatableFields in
objectMetadataItem selector to ease filtering from a developer
experience perspective ( + to help developers think to do it). In
discussion @lucasbordeau @charlesBochet
- Remove non-updatable field from CSV import process (@etiennejouan)
- QA fix / Non-readable fields should not show on show page
- QA fix / It should not be offered to create a kanban view on a
non-readable field
- QA fix / It should not be offered to create view groups on a
non-readable field
- QA fix / Rating field should have a readonly mode
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1262
In this PR we add the update permission check layer by
- for the graphql api: extracting columns to update from the
expressionMap
- for rest api: .save() is used so we need to add the permission layer
to .save directly. We also take advantage of this PR to filter out
non-readable fields from save response (other save returns the whole
entity) - this was planned in
https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1216
The current solution does not work with rest api depth 2 queries, but
this seem to already not work on main (for timeout reasons though, so
different). I offer to create a ticket to fix it altogether later.
- Renamed `WorkflowActionAdapter` to `ToolExecutorWorkflowAction`
- Renamed `settingPermission` table to `permissionFlag` and `setting`
column to `flag`
- Decoupled the send email logic from workflows to tools
- Add new `Tools Permission` section in FE
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix@twenty.com>
In the BE we throw custom errors with precise error codes (e.g.
"LABEL_ALREADY_EXISTS") before catching them in filters and rethrowing
BaseGraphQLErrors (standard errors such as NotFoundError, UserInputError
etc.).
In the FE we were grouping sentries based on the error codes but we were
actually grouping by very broad codes such as "NOT_FOUND" or
"BAD_USER_INPUT", extracted from the BaseGraphQLErrors.
To fix that, we update the BaseGraphQLError constructor api to allow to
pass on the CustomError directly and retrieve from it the original code
and store it in existing property `subCode` that we will use in the FE
to send errors to sentry.
This new api also eases usage of `userFriendlyMessage` that is passed on
to the api response and therefore to the FE when CustomError is passed
on directly to the BaseGraphQLError constructor.
In this PR
- introduction of fieldPermission entity
- addition of upsertFieldPermission in role resolver
- computing of permissions taking fieldPermission into account. In order
to limit what is stored in Redis we only store fields restrictions. For
instance for objectMetadata with id XXX with a restriction on field with
id YYY we store:
`"XXX":{"canRead":true,"canUpdate":false,"canSoftDelete":false,"canDestroy":false,"restrictedFields":{"YYY":{"canRead":false,"canUpdate":null}}}`
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charlesBochet@users.noreply.github.com>
Currently, when a server query or mutation from the front-end fails, the
error message defined server-side is displayed in a snackbar in the
front-end.
These error messages usually contain technical details that don't belong
to the user interface, such as "ObjectMetadataCollection not found" or
"invalid ENUM value for ...".
**BE**
In addition to the original error message that is still needed (for the
request response, debugging, sentry monitoring etc.), we add a
`displayedErrorMessage` that will be used in the snackbars. It's only
relevant to add it for the messages that will reach the FE (ie. not in
jobs or in rest api for instance) and if it can help the user sort out /
fix things (ie. we do add displayedErrorMessage for "Cannot create
multiple draft versions for the same workflow" or "Cannot delete
[field], please update the label identifier field first", but not
"Object metadata does not exist"), even if in practice in the FE users
should not be able to perform an action that will not work (ie should
not be able to save creation of multiple draft versions of the same
workflows).
**FE**
To ease the usage we replaced enqueueSnackBar with enqueueErrorSnackBar
and enqueueSuccessSnackBar with an api that only requires to pass on the
error.
If no displayedErrorMessage is specified then the default error message
is `An error occured.`
This PR introduces a significant enhancement to the role-based
permission system by extending it to support AI agents, enabling them to
perform database operations based on assigned permissions.
## Key Changes
### 1. Database Schema Migration
- **Table Rename**: `userWorkspaceRole` → `roleTargets` to better
reflect its expanded purpose
- **New Column**: Added `agentId` (UUID, nullable) to support AI agent
role assignments
- **Constraint Updates**:
- Made `userWorkspaceId` nullable to accommodate agent-only role
assignments
- Added check constraint `CHK_role_targets_either_agent_or_user`
ensuring either `agentId` OR `userWorkspaceId` is set (not both)
### 2. Entity & Service Layer Updates
- **RoleTargetsEntity**: Updated with new `agentId` field and constraint
validation
- **AgentRoleService**: New service for managing agent role assignments
with validation
- **AgentService**: Enhanced to include role information when retrieving
agents
- **RoleResolver**: Added GraphQL mutations for `assignRoleToAgent` and
`removeRoleFromAgent`
### 3. AI Agent CRUD Operations
- **Permission-Based Tool Generation**: AI agents now receive database
tools based on their assigned role permissions
- **Dynamic Tool Creation**: The `AgentToolService` generates CRUD tools
(`create_*`, `find_*`, `update_*`, `soft_delete_*`, `destroy_*`) for
each object based on role permissions
- **Granular Permissions**: Supports both global role permissions
(`canReadAllObjectRecords`) and object-specific permissions
(`canReadObjectRecords`)
### 4. Frontend Integration
- **Role Assignment UI**: Added hooks and components for
assigning/removing roles from agents
## Demo
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/41732267-742e-416c-b423-b687c2614c82
---------
Co-authored-by: Antoine Moreaux <moreaux.antoine@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
Co-authored-by: Guillim <guillim@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charlesBochet@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Weiko <corentin@twenty.com>
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: github-actions <github-actions@twenty.com>
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Marie <51697796+ijreilly@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: martmull <martmull@hotmail.fr>
Co-authored-by: Thomas Trompette <thomas.trompette@sfr.fr>
Co-authored-by: Etienne <45695613+etiennejouan@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Baptiste Devessier <baptiste@devessier.fr>
Co-authored-by: nitin <142569587+ehconitin@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Paul Rastoin <45004772+prastoin@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: prastoin <paul@twenty.com>
Co-authored-by: Vicky Wang <157669812+vickywxng@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Vicky Wang <vw92@cornell.edu>
Co-authored-by: Raphaël Bosi <71827178+bosiraphael@users.noreply.github.com>
Closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/868
We should not allow to grant any writing permission (update, soft
delete, delete) on an object or at role-level without the reading
permission at the same level.
This has been implemented in the front-end at role level, and is yet to
be done at object level (@Weiko)
# Introduction
In a nutshell this PR introduces a `workspaceMemberEntity` to
`workspaceMemberDto` transpilation which was not done but commented as
`// TODO` across the `user resolver`.
Also passed on the `Roles` and `UserWorkspacePermissions` transpilation
We now also compute the roles for the `workspaceMember` resolver ( not
only the `workspaceMembers` )
Some refactor
In the following days about to create a PR that introduces integration
testing on the user resolver
## Conclusion
As always any suggestions are more than welcomed ! Please let me know !
## Misc
Following https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/11914
closing https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1011
In this PR
- Determine object record permissions on workflows objects (workflow,
workflowVersion, workflowRun) base on settings permissions @Weiko
- Add Workflow permission guards on workflow resolvers @thomtrp . **Any
method within a resolver that has the SettingsPermission Guard is only
callable by a apiKey or a user that has the permission** (so not by
external parties).
- Add checks bypass in workflow services since 1) for actions gated by
settings permissions, the gate should be done at resolver level, so it
will have been done before the call to the service 2) some service
methods may be called by workflowTriggerController which is callable by
external parties without permissions (ex:
workflowCommonWorkspaceService.getWorkflowVersionOrFail). This is
something we may want to change in the future (still to discuss), by
removing the guard at resolver-level and relying on
shouldBypassPermissionChecks at getRepository and made in a way that we
only bypass for external parties.
- Add checks bypass for actions performed by workflows since they should
not be restricted in our current vision
- Add tests
# What
Fully deprecate old relations because we have one bug tied to it and it
make the codebase complex
# How I've made this PR:
1. remove metadata datasource (we only keep 'core') => this was causing
extra complexity in the refactor + flaky reset
2. merge dev and demo datasets => as I needed to update the tests which
is very painful, I don't want to do it twice
3. remove all code tied to RELATION_METADATA /
relation-metadata.resolver, or anything tied to the old relation system
4. Remove ONE_TO_ONE and MANY_TO_MANY that are not supported
5. fix impacts on the different areas : see functional testing below
# Functional testing
## Functional testing from the front-end:
1. Database Reset ✅
2. Sign In ✅
3. Workspace sign-up ✅
5. Browsing table / kanban / show ✅
6. Assigning a record in a one to many / in a many to one ✅
7. Deleting a record involved in a relation ✅ => broken but not tied to
this PR
8. "Add new" from relation picker ✅ => broken but not tied to this PR
9. Creating a Task / Note, Updating a Task / Note relations, Deleting a
Task / Note (from table, show page, right drawer) ✅ => broken but not
tied to this PR
10. creating a relation from settings (custom / standard x oneToMany /
manyToOne) ✅
11. updating a relation from settings should not be possible ✅
12. deleting a relation from settings (custom / standard x oneToMany /
manyToOne) ✅
13. Make sure timeline activity still work (relation were involved
there), espacially with Task / Note => to be double checked ✅ => Cannot
convert undefined or null to object
14. Workspace deletion / User deletion ✅
15. CSV Import should keep working ✅
16. Permissions: I have tested without permissions V2 as it's still hard
to test v2 work and it's not in prod yet ✅
17. Workflows global test ✅
## From the API:
1. Review open-api documentation (REST) ✅
2. Make sure REST Api are still able to fetch relations ==> won't do, we
have a coupling Get/Update/Create there, this requires refactoring
3. Make sure REST Api is still able to update / remove relation => won't
do same
## Automated tests
1. lint + typescript ✅
2. front unit tests: ✅
3. server unit tests 2 ✅
4. front stories: ✅
5. server integration: ✅
6. chromatic check : expected 0
7. e2e check : expected no more that current failures
## Remove // Todos
1. All are captured by functional tests above, nothing additional to do
## (Un)related regressions
1. Table loading state is not working anymore, we see the empty state
before table content
2. Filtering by Creator Tim Ap return empty results
3. Not possible to add Tasks / Notes / Files from show page
# Result
## New seeds that can be easily extended
<img width="1920" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d290d130-2a5f-44e6-b419-7e42a89eec4b"
/>
## -5k lines of code
## No more 'metadata' dataSource (we only have 'core)
## No more relationMetadata (I haven't drop the table yet it's not
referenced in the code anymore)
## We are ready to fix the 6 months lag between current API results and
our mocked tests
## No more bug on relation creation / deletion
---------
Co-authored-by: Weiko <corentin@twenty.com>
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix@twenty.com>
In this PR
1. adding tests on relations and nested relations to make sure that if
any permission is missing, the query fails
2. adding tests on objectRecord permissions to make sure that
permissions granted or restricted by objectPermissions take precedence
on the role's allObjectRecords permissions
Closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/748
In the frame of the work on permissions we
- remove all raw queries possible to use repositories instead
- forbid usage workspaceDataSource.executeRawQueries()
- restrict usage of workspaceDataSource.query() to force developers to
pass on shouldBypassPermissionChecks to use it.
---------
Co-authored-by: greptile-apps[bot] <165735046+greptile-apps[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
## Context
- Introduced objectPermissions in currentUserWorkspace which uses role
permissions from cache so we can fetch granular permissions from the API
- Refactored cached role permissions to map permissions with object
metadata id instead of object metadata name singular to be more flexible
New Cache
<img width="574" alt="Screenshot 2025-05-27 at 11 59 06"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1a090134-1b8a-4681-a630-29f1472178bd"
/>
GQL
<img width="977" alt="Screenshot 2025-05-27 at 11 58 53"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/3b9a82b0-6019-4a25-a6e2-a9e0fb4bb8a0"
/>
Next steps: Use the updated API in the FE to fetch granular permissions
and update useHasObjectReadOnlyPermission hook
I encountered a bug where I was missing permissions while calling
searchResolver because the repository from
`twentyORMManager.getRepository` was missing permissions itself.
The repository was returned from the cached repositories map using a
repository key feature the roleId, the rolesVersion and
featureFlagMapVersion.
I was not able to reproduce but this error should not go unnoticed: we
always expect to find objectPermissions for every roleId in the
datasource now.
I was not able to understand what happened for now but I think throwing
the error will help keeping an eye on it
This PR attemps at improving sentry grouping and filtering by
- Using the exceptionCode as the fingerprint when the error is a
customException. For this to work in this PR we are now throwing
customExceptions instead of internalServerError deprived of their code.
They will still be converted to Internal server errors when sent back as
response
- Filtering 4xx issues where it was missing (for emailVerification
because errors were not handled, for invalid captcha and billing errors
because they are httpErrors and not graphqlErrors)
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix@twenty.com>
In this PR we are
- introducing a cached map `{ userworkspaceId: roleId } `to reduce calls
to get a userWorkspace's role (we were having N+1 around that with
combinedFindMany queries and generally having a lot of avoidable
queries)
- using the roles permissions cache (`{ roleId: { objectNameSingular:
{ canRead: bool, canUpdate: bool, ...} } `) in Permissions V1's
userHasObjectPermission, in order to 1) improve performances to avoid
calls to get roles 2) start using our permissions cache
## Context
CurrentUser is fetched during onboarding however roles and permissions
are not created yet during that stage so an error was thrown. We only
want to fetch permissions after the onboarding of the workspace.
## Context
Now that we can update role settings permissions, we need to reflect
that on the FE as well (hiding/showing nav items + redirection logic).
Feature flag check here is not really needed because since not having
any setting permission will result in the same behavior as Permission
V1.
This PR updates the resolvers to return settings permissions of the
current user
Weiko