1e2b31b040d74c449fdf679a0ba3f8ec00e2b5ee
6 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Copilot
|
9a0295fd3d |
feat: add atomic upsertFieldsWidget mutation to replace multiple view field group/field API calls (#18137)
The `useSaveFieldsWidgetGroups` hook was making multiple sequential API
calls per widget (create groups, delete groups, update groups, update
fields) — non-atomic, chatty, and with heavy diff computation on the
frontend.
## Backend
- **New input DTOs**: `UpsertFieldsWidgetInput` /
`UpsertFieldsWidgetGroupInput` / `UpsertFieldsWidgetFieldInput` — caller
passes the full desired state of groups + fields for a widget
- **`FieldsWidgetUpsertService`**: looks up widget → resolves `viewId`,
diffs against existing flat entity maps, builds optimistic group maps so
newly-created groups can be referenced by field updates in the same
pass, then runs creates/updates/deletes in a single
`validateBuildAndRunWorkspaceMigration` call
- **`upsertFieldsWidget` mutation** added to `ViewFieldGroupResolver`;
new `FIELDS_WIDGET_NOT_FOUND` exception code added and wired into the
GraphQL exception filter
## Frontend
- New `UPSERT_FIELDS_WIDGET` GQL document
- `useSaveFieldsWidgetGroups` replaces all per-operation calls with a
single mutation per widget, passing the full draft state — diff logic
moves entirely to the backend
```graphql
mutation UpsertFieldsWidget($input: UpsertFieldsWidgetInput!) {
upsertFieldsWidget(input: $input) {
id
name
position
isVisible
viewId
viewFields { id isVisible position ... }
}
}
```
Widget IDs are collected from both draft **and** persisted state so
widgets whose draft groups were cleared still trigger deletion of their
server-side groups.
<!-- START COPILOT ORIGINAL PROMPT -->
<details>
<summary>Original prompt</summary>
Start implementation
The user has attached the following file paths as relevant context:
- CLAUDE.md
<analysis>
[Chronological Review: The conversation began with the user requesting a
review of how updates on views are stored in the frontend of record page
layouts. The user expressed a desire to migrate heavy computations and
multiple requests from the frontend to the backend. They proposed
creating a custom upsertFieldsWidget mutation to handle updates
atomically. The conversation has focused on this migration strategy and
its implementation.]
[Intent Mapping: The user explicitly requested to "check how we store
updates on views in the frontend of record page layouts" and indicated a
need to "migrate this task to the backend" by creating a custom mutation
for atomic updates.]
[Technical Inventory: The conversation involves the following technical
concepts:
- Frontend and backend architecture for handling page layout updates.
- Custom GraphQL mutation (upsertFieldsWidget) for atomic updates.
- The file in focus is page-layout-update.service.ts, which is likely
responsible for handling updates related to page layouts in the
backend.]
[Code Archaeology: The specific file being worked on is
/Users/devessier/Web/twenty/packages/twenty-server/src/engine/metadata-modules/page-layout/services/page-layout-update.service.ts.
The user is likely looking to modify or enhance this service to
accommodate the new mutation for handling updates.]
[Progress Assessment: The user has identified the need for a backend
migration strategy but has not yet implemented any changes. The focus is
on planning the transition from frontend to backend processing.]
[Context Validation: All critical information for continuation is
captured, including the user's intent to migrate computations to the
backend and the specific file being modified.]
[Recent Commands Analysis: The last agent commands involved checking the
current file context and the user's request to summarize the
conversation. No specific tool results were generated as the focus was
on summarizing the conversation history. The agent was actively working
on summarizing the conversation when the token budget was exceeded,
which was triggered by the user's request for a summary.]
</analysis>
<summary>
1. Conversation Overview:
- Primary Objectives: The user requested to "check how we store updates
on views in the frontend of record page layouts" and expressed a desire
to "migrate this task to the backend" by creating a custom
upsertFieldsWidget mutation for atomic updates.
- Session Context: The conversation has focused on the need to shift
heavy computations from the frontend to the backend, with an emphasis on
implementing a new mutation to streamline updates.
- User Intent Evolution: The user's needs have remained consistent,
focusing on backend migration for efficiency and atomicity in updates.
2. Technical Foundation:
- Core Technology: The conversation involves a backend service likely
built with Node.js and TypeScript, as indicated by the file path.
- Framework/Library: The use of GraphQL for handling mutations is
implied through the mention of a custom mutation.
- Architectural Pattern: The user is looking to implement a
service-oriented architecture where the backend handles complex
computations instead of the frontend.
- Environment Detail: The current working file is located in a server
package of the twenty repository.
3. Codebase Status:
- File Name: page-layout-update.service.ts
- Purpose: This file is responsible for managing updates related to page
layouts in the backend.
- Current State: The user is considering modifications to implement a
new mutation for handling updates.
- Key Code Segments: Specific functions or classes have not been
detailed yet, as the focus is on planning changes.
- Dependencies: This service likely interacts with other components in
the metadata-modules related to page layouts.
4. Problem Resolution:
- Issues Encountered: The current challenge is the inefficiency of
handling updates in the frontend.
- Solutions Implemented: The proposed solution is to create a custom
mutation to handle updates atomically in the backend.
- Debugging Context: No ongoing troubleshooting efforts have been
mentioned yet.
- Lessons Learned: The need for backend processing to improve
performance has been highlighted.
5. Progress Tracking:
- Completed Tasks: No tasks have been completed yet; the user is in the
planning phase.
- Partially Complete Work: The user is preparing to implement a new
mutation for backend updates.
- Validated Outcomes: No features have been confirmed working through
testing at this stage.
6. Active Work State:
- Current Focus: The user is focused on modifying the
page-layout-update.service.ts to implement the new mutation.
- Recent Context: The last few exchanges involved discussing the
migration of update tasks from the frontend to the backend.
- Working Code: No specific code snippets have been modified yet, as the
co...
</details>
<!-- START COPILOT CODING AGENT SUFFIX -->
Created from [VS
Code](https://code.visualstudio.com/docs/copilot/copilot-coding-agent).
<!-- START COPILOT CODING AGENT TIPS -->
---
💡 You can make Copilot smarter by setting up custom instructions,
customizing its development environment and configuring Model Context
Protocol (MCP) servers. Learn more [Copilot coding agent
tips](https://gh.io/copilot-coding-agent-tips) in the docs.
---------
Co-authored-by: copilot-swe-agent[bot] <198982749+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Devessier <29370468+Devessier@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Baptiste Devessier <baptiste@devessier.fr>
|
||
|
Weiko
|
6aca1dd013 |
Introducing view field group syncable entity (#17867)
## Context Introduces a new viewFieldGroup entity that allows grouping view fields into sections (e.g. "General", "Additional", "Other") within a view. The page layout fields widget needs a way to organize fields into sections. Today, views have no concept of field grouping. This PR introduces the viewFieldGroup entity which sits between a view and its viewFields, enabling section-based organization. <img width="401" height="724" alt="Layout - V2 (customize visibility)" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/6376e2ab-44db-42bf-9d2c-758f56f6b548" /> --------- Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com> |
||
|
Paul Rastoin
|
98a9ae2a0e |
Migrate view filter group to v2 (#16876)
## Introduction On the side hanlded PR with a // agents on another repo Made several iterations to fix behavior and direction Find below auto-generated PR description closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/2037 Created generic tooling for entity circular dep checking, will be useful for permissions validation too @Weiko ## Migrate `viewFilterGroup` entity to v2 flat architecture ### Summary Migrates the `viewFilterGroup` entity from v1 to the v2 flat entity architecture, following the established patterns for other v2 entities like `viewFilter`, `view`, and `viewField`. ### Changes **Types & Constants** - Added `FlatViewFilterGroup` and `FlatViewFilterGroupMaps` types - Added editable properties constant for `viewFilterGroup` - Registered `viewFilterGroup` in `ALL_METADATA_NAME`, `ALL_METADATA_RELATION_PROPERTIES`, `ALL_METADATA_MANY_TO_ONE_RELATIONS`, and related constants **Cache Service** - Created `WorkspaceFlatViewFilterGroupMapCacheService` with proper relation loading for `viewFilters` and `childViewFilterGroups` - Updated `WorkspaceFlatViewMapCacheService` to load `viewFilterGroups` relation **Builder & Validator** - Created `WorkspaceMigrationV2ViewFilterGroupActionsBuilderService` - Created `FlatViewFilterGroupValidatorService` with creation, update, and deletion validation - Integrated validation into the orchestrator service (runs before `viewFilter` validation) **Action Handlers** - Created create, update, and delete action handlers for `viewFilterGroup` **Service Migration** - Rewrote `ViewFilterGroupService` to use v2 migration pattern with `WorkspaceMigrationValidateBuildAndRunService` - Created utility functions for transforming DTOs to flat entities **Database Migration** - Added migration to make `parentViewFilterGroupId` foreign key deferrable (handles self-referential parent/child insertions) **ViewFilter Integration** - Added `viewFilterGroupId` validation in `FlatViewFilterValidatorService` - Updated `viewFilter` many-to-one relations to include `viewFilterGroup` **Tests** - Added integration tests for successful creation, update, deletion, and destruction - Added failing test cases for non-existent entities and invalid references - Added failing test for `viewFilter` creation with non-existent `viewFilterGroupId` ### Breaking Changes None - existing API contracts are preserved. |
||
|
Marie
|
7ce22d5c7e |
breaking (soft) - Migrate viewGroup.fieldMetadataId -> view.mainGroupByFieldMetadataId (2/3) (#16277)
Should be merged once https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/16206 has been released + command run to prod In this PR - Remove usage of viewGroup.fieldMetadataId, both in BE and FE states. - But we still need to properly populate it until we fully remove viewGroup.fieldMetadataId from db and ORM entity (upcoming 3rd PR out of 3). fieldMetadataId was removed from CoreViewGroup type and CreateViewGroupInput and is determined BE-side based on the associated view's mainGroupByFieldMetadataId. **I expect this means a downtime on viewGroup creation, until both FE and BE are deployed and cache is flushed.** This seems acceptable to me as it only regards viewGroup creation. - this information is replaced by view.mainGroupByFieldMetadataID - Handle view group creation, update and deletion in the BE as a side-effect of a view creation, update or deletion. Optimistic effects are still used - Add validation at view creation or update regarding mainGroupByFieldMetadata Left to do in 3rd PR - Remove viewGroup.fieldMetadataId from db and ORM entity - Restore feature allowing to update an existing grouped view's group by field (already OK on BE side but need to rebuild FE optimistic) |
||
|
Paul Rastoin
|
7d747c9876 |
[REQUIRES_CACHE_FLUSH][GQL_VIEW_GROUP_API_BREAKING_CHANGE] ViewGroup in v2 (#15052)
# Introduction Adding view-group to core engine v2 Following https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/15010 ( same pattern ) ## What's done - Created flat-view-group - flat view group runner - flat view group builder - create view group service v2 and input transpilers - refactor the existing view group resolver to fix standard ( BREAKING_CHANGE on graphql api update especially ) REST stays the same - refactored the front to consume the mutations autogenerated close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1665 |
||
|
Raphaël Bosi
|
593b064448 |
Create resolvers and controllers for core views (#13624)
Created: - Services - Resolvers - Controllers - Tests for services - Integration tests for GraphQL and Rest Updated the Rest API playground Added new feature flag `IS_CORE_VIEW_ENABLED` Updated `viewFilter` `operand` and `view` `type` to be enums rather than strings and generated migration file. Closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1259 --------- Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com> |