Commit Graph

5 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Félix Malfait 1a5675d63e feat: add sorting on relation fields (Many-to-One) (#17021)
## Summary

This PR enables sorting records by fields of related objects. For
example, sorting **People by their Company's name**.

### Before
Only scalar and composite fields could be sorted. Relation fields showed
in the sort dropdown but produced errors.

### After
Many-to-One relation fields can now be sorted using the related object's
**label identifier field** (e.g., Company's `name`).

---

## Changes

### Frontend
- Added `RELATION` to sortable field types (restricted to `MANY_TO_ONE`
relations)
- New `getOrderByForRelationField()` generates nested orderBy structures
using the related object's label identifier
- Updated `turnSortsIntoOrderBy()` to handle relation fields by looking
up related object metadata

### Backend
- Extended `GraphqlQueryOrderFieldParser.parse()` to detect nested
relation ordering like `{ company: { name: 'AscNullsLast' } }`
- Returns `ParseOrderByResult` containing both `orderBy` conditions and
`relationJoins` info
- Added LEFT JOINs for relation ordering in `applyOrderToBuilder()`
- Added `addRelationOrderColumnsToBuilder()` for TypeORM DISTINCT
compatibility

### Tests
- Added unit tests for `filterSortableFieldMetadataItems`,
`getOrderByForRelationField`, and `turnSortsIntoOrderBy`
- Added integration tests covering ascending/descending order and
composite label identifiers

---

## TypeORM Bug Workaround

We encountered a significant TypeORM limitation when implementing this
feature. When using `getMany()` with `ORDER BY` on joined relation
columns, TypeORM generates a DISTINCT subquery that has specific
requirements:

### Issue 1: Alias Parsing
TypeORM's `orderBy()` method fails with **"alias not found"** when using
quoted SQL identifiers like `"company"."name"`. TypeORM internally
expects unquoted property paths (e.g., `company.name`) for its alias
resolution mechanism.

### Issue 2: setFindOptions Clears addSelect
`setFindOptions({ select })` **clears any previously added `addSelect()`
columns**. This caused `"column distinctAlias.company_name does not
exist"` errors because the relation columns needed for ORDER BY were
being removed.

### Solution
We split the logic into two methods:
1. `applyOrderToBuilder()` - adds JOINs and ORDER BY (before
`setFindOptions`)
2. `addRelationOrderColumnsToBuilder()` - adds relation columns for
SELECT (AFTER `setFindOptions`)

This ensures the relation columns are present in the final SQL query's
SELECT clause with the proper underscore aliases (`company_name`) that
TypeORM's DISTINCT subquery expects.

**Related TypeORM issue**:
https://github.com/typeorm/typeorm/issues/9921

---

## Screenshots/Demo

_Add screenshots if applicable_
2026-01-10 11:02:16 +01:00
Marie 19c9f957b1 Improve userFriendlyMessage devX (#16815)
Two challenges with error messages
- always provide a useful/meaningful error message for the end user
instead of the generic one. eg: show "Wrong password" and not "An error
occured"
- avoid technical details unless error regards a technical feature. eg:
show "An error occured" and not "Invalid post-hook payload."; but do
show "Invalid issuer URL." as it occurs while configuring SSO

What this PR does
- Make userFriendlyMessage mandatory for widely used
GraphqlQueryRunnerException and CommonQueryRunnerException, so that
developers are forced to ask themselves what the error message should
be, and as it contains very wide error codes (eg: "Bad request") which
should not be mapped to just one default message
- Keep userFriendlyMessage optional for service-specific exceptions (eg:
workflowStepExecutorException), but convert the error code to
userFriendlyMessage mapper to a switch case function with a typecheck
ensuring that all codes are mapped to a message. These default messages
are still overridable where they are thrown.
2025-12-30 09:08:43 +00:00
Marie f65783f900 [GroupBy] Allow sorting in bar chart (#15097)
Closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1628

From a technical perspective, we can add more ordering options, such as
the ability to combine two sorts on the X axis, e.g. sort by Close date
ASC and then by Sum ASC, which will sort groups that have the same close
date between themselves depending on their sum ASC. @Bonapara could you
provide design if you want this to be implemented (quite short on our
hand i think - maybe in V2 though)?


https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/6ef21fe1-9d8f-43c0-bfa2-f6fc6341cacf

---------

Co-authored-by: ehconitin <nitinkoche03@gmail.com>
2025-10-15 17:41:14 +05:30
Félix Malfait 8b4b9ef8da Change type import rule (#13751)
Forcing "type" to be explicit, works best will rollup on the frontend to
exclude depdendencies
2025-08-08 01:27:05 +02:00
Raphaël Bosi d4995ab54e Fix cursor-based pagination with lexicographic ordering for composite fields (#12467)
# Fix cursor-based pagination with lexicographic ordering for composite
fields

## Bug

The existing cursor-based pagination implementation had a bug when
handling composite fields.
When paginating through results sorted by composite fields (like
`fullName` with sub-properties `firstName` and`lastName`), the WHERE
conditions generated for cursor positioning were incorrect, leading to
records being skipped.

The previous implementation was generating wrong WHERE conditions:

For example, when paginating with a cursor like `{ firstName: 'John',
lastName: 'Doe' }`, it would generate:

```sql
WHERE firstName > 'John' AND lastName > 'Doe'
```

This is incorrect because it would miss records like `{ firstName:
'John', lastName: 'Smith' }` which should be included in forward
pagination.

## Fix

Create a new util to use proper lexicographic order when sorting a
composite field.

---------

Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charlesBochet@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
2025-06-11 14:48:03 +00:00