Files
twenty/packages
Charles Bochet eca92ca559 fix(server): rebuild unique phone indexes drops legacy non-empty partial WHERE clause (#20606)
## Summary

`RebuildUniquePhoneIndexesCommand` reuses each index's existing
`indexWhereClause` when recreating the physical index. For workspaces
whose unique phone indexes have a legacy clause like
`"primaryPhoneNumber" != ''` (created before PR #18024 hardened the
validator allowlist), the recreate path fails at
`validateAndReturnIndexWhereClause` because the clause isn't in
`ALLOWED_INDEX_WHERE_CLAUSES`.

Two workspaces are hitting this on the 2.5 upgrade:
- `3a797122-…` — `"companyPhonePrimaryPhoneNumber" != ''`
- `ea74716f-…` — `"phonesPrimaryPhoneNumber" != ''`

## Fix

Detect the legacy `"<col>" != ''` shape via a strict regex. When it's
there, before the existing drop+create, do three things inside the
workspace transaction:

1. **Normalize the data** that the legacy partial clause was masking —
`UPDATE "<schema>"."<table>" SET "<col>" = NULL WHERE "<col>" = ''` for
every column the index covers. Without this the next step would fail
because the new plain-unique index would see duplicate `''` values
across the rows the old partial clause was excluding.
2. **Null out `core."indexMetadata".indexWhereClause`** so the metadata
row matches what the UI would have created (`indexWhereClause: null`)
and doesn't carry the validator-rejected clause forward to any future
re-emit. Uses the same workspace `queryRunner` (Postgres lets one
connection write across schemas).
3. **Recreate** with an overridden flat index where `indexWhereClause:
null`. `createIndexInWorkspaceSchema` → `indexManager.createIndex` →
`validateAndReturnIndexWhereClause` short-circuits on null, no allowlist
check.

End state matches the shape a fresh "toggle unique in Settings UI"
creates: plain unique index, no `WHERE`, NULL semantics doing the
"exclude empty phones" work via PG's default NULL-distinct behaviour.

For indexes whose clause is already allowlisted (`"deletedAt" IS NULL`)
or null, behaviour is unchanged — just the column-list widening this
command already does.
2026-05-15 16:39:34 +02:00
..
2026-05-04 11:09:34 +02:00
2026-05-15 13:08:34 +02:00