9be2b21e51
Fixes a usage under-counting bug introduced by #22524 (progressive assistant-message persistence), flagged by @cubic-dev-ai and confirmed by @FelixMalfait. ## Root cause #22524 gated the thread-totals update (tokens, credits, `conversationSize`) on `assistantMessageExistedAtStart` — an existence check on the deterministic `uuidv5(streamId)` message id captured at job start. That was a sound idempotency signal *before* #22524, when the message only ever existed if a prior run had completed and applied totals. Progressive checkpoints broke that assumption: a checkpoint creates the message row ~2s into the stream, without applying totals. So if the worker is SIGKILLed after a checkpoint but before `handleStreamFinish`, and the job is re-delivered (BullMQ's stalled re-run — `aiStreamQueue` has no `maxStalledCount: 0` yet, that's #22518 — or an admin `retryJobs`), the re-run sees `assistantMessageExistedAtStart === true` and returns before the totals update. The turn's usage is lost permanently. cubic's P2 (the non-transactional `delete`+`insert` in `upsertAssistantMessage`) is the same root cause: its partless window only mattered because it tripped the same existence-based gate. ## Fix Stop inferring "totals already applied" from message existence. Gate the totals update on **still owning the stream** — a conditional `UPDATE ... WHERE id = :threadId AND activeStreamId = :streamId`, and only `notifyThreadUsageUpdated` when it affects a row. This is the same claim pattern the stream already uses (#22481), and it's idempotent by construction: - The run that completes while holding the claim → `affected = 1` → totals applied exactly once. This holds **even when a checkpoint already created the message**, which is precisely the bug. - A duplicate/zombie run after another run completed (and its `finally` cleared `activeStreamId`) → `affected = 0` → skipped, no double-count. - A superseded run whose thread has moved to a newer stream → `affected = 0` → skipped (defense-in-depth, aligns with #22518's ownership pre-check). The `assistantMessageExistedAtStart` flag and its start-of-stream `hasMessageById` query are removed entirely — the message write is already idempotent via the deterministic id + `upsert`, so it needs no gate. This subsumes cubic's P2: the totals are no longer lost regardless of the `delete`+`insert` window, so no transaction is required for correctness (the residual window is a benign sub-millisecond transient for an actively-streaming message; happy to add a workspace-datasource transaction as separate hardening if you'd prefer). ## Validation `stream-agent-chat.job.spec.ts` (9 green): - New: totals update returns `affected: 0` → `notifyThreadUsageUpdated` **not** called (prior completion not double-counted), message still upserted. - New: message already exists from a checkpoint but claim still held (`affected: 1`) → totals **are** applied — the exact regression #22524 caused. - Existing success/error/cancel/abort flows updated for the conditional criteria and still green. <!-- This is an auto-generated description by cubic. --> <a href="https://cubic.dev/pr/twentyhq/twenty/pull/22534?utm_source=github" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-no-image-dialog="true"><picture><source media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)" srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"><source media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)" srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-light.svg"><img alt="Review in cubic" src="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"></picture></a> <!-- End of auto-generated description by cubic. -->