ba5cb6ba15
Fixes #23254 ## Problem Upgrading a self-hosted instance from `2.23.x` to `2.24.0` leaves `core.keyValuePair` without the `applicationId` column. Database-backed config loading then fails on startup and on every refresh (~every 15s) with: ``` column KeyValuePairEntity.applicationId does not exist ``` The frontend shows "Unable to reach the backend". ## Root cause `AddApplicationIdToKeyValuePairFastInstanceCommand` was added in #23089 (after `2.23.x` shipped) but registered under the already-released `2.23.0` segment: ```ts @RegisteredInstanceCommand('2.23.0', 1784659343818) ``` The upgrade cursor is **positional and forward-only**: - `resolveStartCursor` resumes at `lastAttemptedIndex + 1`. A fully-upgraded `2.23.x` instance has its cursor at the last `2.23` workspace command, which sits *after* this newly-inserted fast command in the sequence. So the runner steps right over it and the DDL never runs. - The upgrade-aware metadata layer decides "applied" the same way (`stepIndex < currentCursor` in `upgrade-aware-entity-metadata.adapter.ts`). Since the step index is below the cursor, the column is considered applied and is **not** hidden from TypeORM SELECTs, so every query references a column that was never created. Fresh `2.24.0` installs replay the whole sequence, so only `2.23.x -> 2.24.0` upgrades are affected. The instance log `1 fast instance ... for 2.24.0` confirms the command landed in the `2.23.0` bundle rather than `2.24.0`. ## Fix - Add `RepairKeyValuePairApplicationIdFastInstanceCommand` under the current version (`2.24.0`) with a fresh timestamp, so it sorts last in the sequence and runs for every existing instance regardless of cursor position. Its DDL mirrors the original command and is fully idempotent (`ADD COLUMN IF NOT EXISTS`, `DROP INDEX IF EXISTS` + recreate, `ADD VALUE IF NOT EXISTS`), so it is a no-op on healthy instances. `down()` is intentionally empty: the column lifecycle is owned by the `2.23.0` introduction command. - Repoint the entity's `@WasIntroducedInUpgrade` to the new command so the column stays hidden from queries until the repair has actually run, eliminating the error window during the migration itself. ## Notes - `2.24.0` (`TWENTY_CURRENT_VERSION`) is the correct target: the upgrade sequence only covers previous + current versions, so a command under `2.25.0` (a next version) would not run. If a version bump lands before this merges, the command should be moved to the new current version. - Follow-up worth considering: nothing currently prevents registering a command under a version in `TWENTY_PREVIOUS_VERSIONS`. A startup validation rejecting that would have caught this at PR time. <!-- This is an auto-generated description by cubic. --> <a href="https://cubic.dev/pr/twentyhq/twenty/pull/23272?utm_source=github" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-no-image-dialog="true"><picture><source media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)" srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"><source media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)" srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-light.svg"><img alt="Review in cubic" src="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"></picture></a> <!-- End of auto-generated description by cubic. -->