# Context
Since #22594 merged (July 9, 16:59 CET), `server-integration-test (12)`
fails deterministically on every main-based branch. The failure is easy
to misread as flakiness because nx truncates the failed task's replayed
output before jest's `FAIL`/summary lines reach the CI log; the visible
`timelineActivity` FK-violation errors are pre-existing noise also
present in green runs.
Note: the flakiness PRs merged yesterday morning (#22699, #22701,
#22702) are not the cause. The failure window starts with #22594.
# Root cause
#22594 moved `searchVector` provisioning out of the
reserved-system-fields path into its own side-effect handler, registered
after `ObjectSystemFieldsOnCreateSideEffectHandlerService` in
`metadata-side-effect-handlers.module.ts`. The `searchVector` field
entry therefore now appears after `updatedAt`/`updatedBy` in the
create-object validation report. The snapshot for
`failing-create-one-object-metadata-v2.integration-spec.ts` was
rewritten in #22594 but kept the old `position -> searchVector ->
updatedAt` ordering, so 15 of the 19 tests fail on a snapshot mismatch.
Reproduced locally on latest main: 15/19 fail, diff is exactly the three
reordered name lines.
# Fix
Regenerated the snapshot with `jest -u` against a freshly reset
database. Suite is 19/19 green afterwards. The sibling snapshot suites
in the same directory (`failing-update-one-object-metadata`,
`failing-update-one-standard-object-metadata`,
`successful-update-one-standard-object-metadata`) were re-run and pass
unchanged.
Pure block move: only the `searchVector`/`updatedAt`/`updatedBy` name
lines relocate, 15 occurrences each (45+/45-), one file, no product
code.
# Related
- #22757 is an earlier draft with the same snapshot regeneration.
- #22758 fixes the same suite by replacing the snapshot with per-case
contract assertions (plus an msw catch-all). If that one merges first,
this PR becomes unnecessary.
---
_Generated by [Claude
Code](https://claude.ai/code/session_01NPSkHDBHNQw4c1iJzFTxoA)_
<!-- This is an auto-generated description by cubic. -->
<a
href="https://cubic.dev/pr/twentyhq/twenty/pull/22768?utm_source=github"
target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"
data-no-image-dialog="true"><picture><source
media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)"
srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"><source
media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)"
srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-light.svg"><img
alt="Review in cubic"
src="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"></picture></a>
<!-- End of auto-generated description by cubic. -->
Co-authored-by: Martin <martin@twenty.com>
martmull
d430e38a9a
