# Introduction
This has been fixed on main already 1 hour ago, this PR now only passes
the field application id instead of the object applicationId that could
be different for example when creating a custom field on a standard
object
For the moment not introducing any logic around application integrity
directly and still relying on the isCustom and standardId definition
This will have to be refactored once we deprecate the standardId
Paul Rastoin
1128331cc1