Files
twenty/packages/twenty-server/test
Paul Rastoin e9a030f762 fix(server): allow relabelling onto a field introduced in the same manifest sync (#22727)
## Context

Closes twentyhq/core-team-issues#2655.

`computeOrderedMigrationActions` runs `objectMetadata.update` **before**
`fieldMetadata.create`. In a single manifest sync that both introduces a
new field and relabels the object's
`labelIdentifierFieldMetadataUniversalIdentifier` onto that field, the
object update handler resolved the label identifier's universal
identifier against the persisted `flatFieldMetadataMaps` only. Since the
field's `fieldMetadata.create` runs later in the same migration, the
field isn't in the maps yet and the sync failed with `ENTITY_NOT_FOUND`.

The API metadata path is unaffected because create-field and
update-object are separate requests (separate transactions), so the
field is already persisted by the time the object update resolves.

## What this does

`update-object-action-handler.service.ts` now resolves
`labelIdentifierFieldMetadataId` and `imageIdentifierFieldMetadataId`
against the deterministically preallocated field ids first, then falls
back to the persisted flat maps for fields that already exist.

The preallocated ids
(`preallocatedIdByUniversalIdentifierByMetadataName`) are built from
every create action before the migration loop starts
(`buildPreallocatedIdByUniversalIdentifierFromActions`) and are the same
ids `create-field-action-handler` persists the fields with. This is the
same "preallocated-first, then flat maps" resolution that
`resolveUniversalRelationIdentifiersToIds` already uses for modeled
many-to-one relations, so no ordering change or new machinery is needed,
and the single sync stays one atomic transaction.

This does not touch the underlying action ordering or the hand-rolled
label/image identifier handling flagged by the `#2172` TODO;
generalizing those into the relation config remains the follow-up.

## Test

Adds `relabel-onto-new-field-manifest-sync.integration-spec.ts` (used as
the TDD reproduction, now green):
- introducing a field and relabelling onto it in a single sync succeeds,
and the object's `labelIdentifierFieldMetadataId` points at the new
field;
- the split path (introduce in one sync, relabel in the next) still
succeeds and exposes the enriched `labelIdentifierFieldMetadataId`
through the metadata API.

Both cases pass against the fix. `oxlint`, `oxfmt`, and `typecheck` are
clean.

---
_Generated by [Claude
Code](https://claude.ai/code/session_01KJewXMuWYUyrX3YJh2JBDE)_

<!-- This is an auto-generated description by cubic. -->
<a
href="https://cubic.dev/pr/twentyhq/twenty/pull/22727?utm_source=github"
target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"
data-no-image-dialog="true"><picture><source
media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)"
srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"><source
media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)"
srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-light.svg"><img
alt="Review in cubic"
src="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"></picture></a>
<!-- End of auto-generated description by cubic. -->
2026-07-09 17:00:49 +02:00
..