## Summary
Alternative to #20717. Same goal (clean up the filter dispatcher API
after #20670) but smaller and follows the codebase's "pass data, not
behavior" style.
The dispatcher takes a `fieldMetadataItems: FieldShared[]` array
directly instead of a `findFieldMetadataItemById: (id) => FieldShared |
undefined` callback. The util builds the id lookup internally — once per
call, used for both source-field and relation-target-field lookups. No
new types, no separate hydration step.
## What changes
**`twenty-shared`**
- `computeRecordGqlOperationFilter` /
`turnRecordFilterIntoRecordGqlOperationFilter` /
`turnRecordFilterGroupsIntoGqlOperationFilter`: replace
`findFieldMetadataItemById` param with `fieldMetadataItems` /
`fieldMetadataItemById` (internal Map).
- Remove the exported `FindFieldMetadataItemById` type.
- `turnAnyFieldFilterIntoRecordGqlFilter`: rename its internal
`fieldById` Map for consistency.
- Tests updated to pass arrays.
**Frontend (15 call sites)**
- Switch from `fieldMetadataItemByIdMapSelector` to
`flattenedFieldMetadataItemsSelector`.
- Pass `fieldMetadataItems: flattenedFieldMetadataItems` to the
dispatcher.
- `useFindManyRecordsSelectedInContextStore` keeps the Map selector
because it still does a per-filter lookup for the soft-delete check.
**Server (5 call sites)**
- Pass
`Object.values(flatFieldMetadataMaps.byUniversalIdentifier).filter(isDefined)`.
## Why this over #20717#20717 moves resolution into a separate hydration step + introduces a
`HydratedRecordFilter` type. The bug that #20717 originally surfaced was
Sentry catching 4 critical runtime errors during review
(`fieldMetadataItemByIdMap` declared but not passed). The added type and
the explicit hydration boundary are extra surface area for not much
benefit — the existing API was a callback wrapping a Map at every call
site, and the natural simplification is to just pass the Map (or its
array) directly.
Net diff: **196 insertions, 203 deletions** (~7 lines net removed). 32
files.
## Test plan
- [x] Shared filter unit tests pass (461 tests)
- [x] Frontend filter/context-store tests pass (13 tests)
- [x] Frontend typecheck passes
- [x] Server typecheck passes
- [x] Lint passes (frontend + server)
- [ ] Integration tests on #20670 still pass — workflow find-records +
chart-data with relation-traversal filter still work end-to-end through
the new array param
Charles Bochet
1a9f786e42