feat(twenty-front): relation traversal in filter dropdown (stacked) (#20533)
**Stacked on #20527** https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/48995655-401a-4c35-8094-e88da8408bdd ## Summary Surfaces the one-hop relation traversal added in #20527 through the existing **composite sub-field dropdown pattern**. Clicking a MANY_TO_ONE relation field in the "+ Filter" picker now opens the same second-level dropdown that composite fields (FULL_NAME, ADDRESS, CURRENCY, etc.) already use — populated with the target object's filterable fields. Picking one (e.g. `Company → Name`) builds a filter that serializes to the nested GraphQL filter the backend now accepts: `{ company: { name: { ilike: "%X%" } } }`. No new components. The whole feature reuses `AdvancedFilterSubFieldSelectMenu` + the existing `subFieldNameUsedInDropdownComponentState` + the existing `MenuItem hasSubMenu` indicator. Only the conditions that gate the sub-menu (and the sub-menu's content for relations) were broadened. ## What landed | File | Change | |---|---| | `ObjectFilterDropdownFilterSelectMenuItem` | Sub-menu chevron now shows on MANY_TO_ONE relations (`isManyToOneRelationField` util). | | `AdvancedFilterFieldSelectMenu` | Relation clicks open the sub-menu alongside composite clicks. | | `AdvancedFilterSubFieldSelectMenu` | New branch: when the sub-menu type is `'RELATION'`, render the target object's filterable fields via `useFilterableFieldMetadataItems(targetObjectMetadataId)`. Composite logic untouched. | | `objectFilterDropdownSubMenuFieldType` state | Widened to accept a `'RELATION'` sentinel. Role-permissions sub-field menu narrows it back out (it doesn't traverse relations). | | `useSelectFieldUsedInAdvancedFilterDropdown` | New optional `targetFieldMetadataItem` arg. When present, the stored RecordFilter's `type` is the target field's type so the operand picker and value input render the target's operands (`'TEXT'` operators when filtering `company.name`, etc.). | | `turnRecordFilterIntoGqlOperationFilter` (shared) | When the filter targets a `RELATION` field with a `subFieldName`, synthesize a field-metadata for the target, recurse to build the inner filter, then wrap it under the relation field's name → `{ relationName: { targetFieldName: { ...operator } } }`. | `RecordFilter.subFieldName` stays narrowly typed as `CompositeFieldSubFieldName` so the wide downstream consumers (`shouldShowFilterTextInput`, composite handlers in the serializer, etc.) don't change. The relation target field's name is stored through a narrowly-scoped cast at the dropdown's storage point — the serializer checks `filter.type === 'RELATION'` before interpreting it as a target field name, so the cast can't be mis-read by composite-only code paths. ## Test plan - [ ] Open a table view on People, click "+ Filter", click "Company" → sub-menu opens with Company's filterable fields - [ ] Pick "Name" → operand picker shows TEXT operators (Contains, Equals, …) - [ ] Type "Airbnb" → filter applies, table shows people whose company name contains "Airbnb" - [ ] Verify network tab: the GraphQL filter variable is `{ company: { name: { ilike: "%Airbnb%" } } }` - [ ] Same flow with a composite target field (e.g. `Company → annualRecurringRevenue → amountMicros`) — should work end-to-end (backend supports composite-within-relation; #20527 has an integration test covering this) - [ ] Composite fields (FULL_NAME, ADDRESS) still open their normal sub-menu and filter correctly — no regression - [ ] Role-permissions field-select sub-field menu is unaffected (it bails out early on the RELATION sentinel) ## Out of scope - ONE_TO_MANY traversal (no backend support yet) - Aggregates (`people.count > 5`) - Persisting relation-traversal filters into a saved view (ViewFilter has no `relationPath` column yet; that's a separate slice) - REST API DSL changes - AI Tools 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
+2
@@ -96,6 +96,8 @@ export const createStandardViewFilterFlatMetadata = <
|
||||
operand,
|
||||
value,
|
||||
subFieldName,
|
||||
relationTargetFieldMetadataId: null,
|
||||
relationTargetFieldMetadataUniversalIdentifier: null,
|
||||
positionInViewFilterGroup,
|
||||
createdAt: now,
|
||||
updatedAt: now,
|
||||
|
||||
+11
-6
@@ -26,12 +26,16 @@ export class CreateViewFilterActionHandlerService extends WorkspaceMigrationRunn
|
||||
flatApplication,
|
||||
workspaceId,
|
||||
}: WorkspaceMigrationActionRunnerArgs<UniversalCreateViewFilterAction>): Promise<FlatCreateViewFilterAction> {
|
||||
const { fieldMetadataId, viewId, viewFilterGroupId } =
|
||||
resolveUniversalRelationIdentifiersToIds({
|
||||
flatEntityMaps: allFlatEntityMaps,
|
||||
metadataName: action.metadataName,
|
||||
universalForeignKeyValues: action.flatEntity,
|
||||
});
|
||||
const {
|
||||
fieldMetadataId,
|
||||
viewId,
|
||||
viewFilterGroupId,
|
||||
relationTargetFieldMetadataId,
|
||||
} = resolveUniversalRelationIdentifiersToIds({
|
||||
flatEntityMaps: allFlatEntityMaps,
|
||||
metadataName: action.metadataName,
|
||||
universalForeignKeyValues: action.flatEntity,
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
const emptyUniversalForeignKeyAggregators =
|
||||
getUniversalFlatEntityEmptyForeignKeyAggregators({
|
||||
@@ -45,6 +49,7 @@ export class CreateViewFilterActionHandlerService extends WorkspaceMigrationRunn
|
||||
fieldMetadataId,
|
||||
viewId,
|
||||
viewFilterGroupId,
|
||||
relationTargetFieldMetadataId,
|
||||
id: action.id ?? v4(),
|
||||
applicationId: flatApplication.id,
|
||||
workspaceId,
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user