fix(filters): make filter dispatcher own relation-target resolution (#20670)
## Summary Two relation-traversal bugs surfaced post-merge of #20533, both rooted in the same architectural smell: the GraphQL filter dispatcher took a flat `fields: FieldShared[]` array and silently dropped any filter whose `relationTargetFieldMetadataId` wasn't in that array. Callers had to remember to pre-augment the list with relation targets — and 16+ call sites did not all know this. This PR fixes both bugs and removes the smell. ### Bug 1 — Save as new view loses the relation target `useCreateViewFromCurrentView` built the create-filter input without `relationTargetFieldMetadataId`. The saved view's filter persisted without the traversal — on reload the chip showed "Company contains 'air'" instead of "Company → Name contains 'air'". Discarded at save time, not at read time. Fix: include `relationTargetFieldMetadataId` in the create input. (Commit 1.) ### Bug 2 — Workflow Search Records drops one-hop traversals `FindRecordsWorkflowAction` built its fields list from `flatObjectMetadata.fieldIds` only (source object's fields). The shared dispatcher then couldn't resolve the relation target field on the related object and silently dropped the filter — a configured "People where Company → Name Contains 'Airbnb'" came through as `{ and: [] }`. This was the same shape as bugs already fixed in 5 other call sites (chart filters, view filters, record table, etc.). The pattern was: caller forgets to augment fields → dispatcher silently drops the filter. Fix (commit 2): change the dispatcher to take a `findFieldMetadataItemById: (id) => FieldShared | undefined` resolver callback. Both source-field and relation-target-field lookups go through the same resolver, so callers no longer need to know about the augmentation requirement. Frontend callers pass a workspace-wide resolver built from `flattenedFieldMetadataItemsSelector`; server callers wrap `findFlatEntityByIdInFlatEntityMaps` on `flatFieldMetadataMaps`. In both cases relation-target lookups just work, because the resolver can see fields on related objects. ## Why this matters Before: "if you call the dispatcher, pre-augment your fields list with relation targets, or filters get silently dropped." An invariant only enforceable by code review, broken often enough to ship two user-visible bugs in one week. After: the dispatcher resolves field ids itself. There's no list to forget to augment. The failure mode (filter silently dropped) becomes structurally impossible at the dispatcher boundary. Net diff: 240 insertions, 319 deletions. Removed `augmentFieldsWithRelationTargets` (frontend) and the workflow whack-a-mole code (server). ## Test plan - [ ] Save view: create an advanced filter using a one-hop relation traversal, click "Save as new view", reload, confirm the chip still reads "Source → Target operator value" - [ ] Workflow: configure a Search Records action with a relation-traversal filter, run the workflow, confirm the filter is actually applied - [ ] Dashboard chart: configure a chart with a relation-traversal filter, confirm the chart data respects it - [ ] Record table, group-by, calendar, total count, footer aggregates: all continue to work with both plain and relation-traversal filters
This commit is contained in:
+5
-32
@@ -107,39 +107,12 @@ export class ViewQueryParamsService {
|
||||
: RecordFilterGroupLogicalOperator.AND,
|
||||
}));
|
||||
|
||||
const filterFieldMetadataIds = recordFilters.flatMap((filter) =>
|
||||
isDefined(filter.relationTargetFieldMetadataId)
|
||||
? [filter.fieldMetadataId, filter.relationTargetFieldMetadataId]
|
||||
: [filter.fieldMetadataId],
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
const fields = filterFieldMetadataIds
|
||||
.map((fieldMetadataId) => {
|
||||
const field = findFlatEntityByIdInFlatEntityMaps({
|
||||
flatEntityId: fieldMetadataId,
|
||||
flatEntityMaps: flatFieldMetadataMaps,
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
if (!field) return null;
|
||||
|
||||
return {
|
||||
id: field.id,
|
||||
name: field.name,
|
||||
type: field.type,
|
||||
label: field.label,
|
||||
options: field.options?.map((opt) => ({
|
||||
id: opt.id ?? '',
|
||||
label: opt.label,
|
||||
value: opt.value,
|
||||
color: 'color' in opt ? opt.color : undefined,
|
||||
position: opt.position,
|
||||
})),
|
||||
};
|
||||
})
|
||||
.filter(isDefined);
|
||||
|
||||
const filter = computeRecordGqlOperationFilter({
|
||||
fields,
|
||||
findFieldMetadataItemById: (id) =>
|
||||
findFlatEntityByIdInFlatEntityMaps({
|
||||
flatEntityId: id,
|
||||
flatEntityMaps: flatFieldMetadataMaps,
|
||||
}),
|
||||
recordFilters,
|
||||
recordFilterGroups,
|
||||
filterValueDependencies: { currentWorkspaceMemberId, timeZone },
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user